Re: Should Log4j API bridges have a 3.x release?

I'm sorry for being unclear! What I mean is that the current code built on 8 will behave and perform identically to the current code built on 17. Is that correct? John On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 10:04 AM Ralph Goers wrote: > > > > On May 30, 2024, at 7:43 AM, John Engebretson > wrote: > >

Re: Should Log4j API bridges have a 3.x release?

Log4j 2.x will run fine on Java 8. However, the logging Parent POM requires Java 17 to run the build. Ralph > On Jun 3, 2024, at 5:47 AM, John Engebretson wrote: > > I'm sorry for being unclear! What I mean is that the current code built > on 8 will behave and perform identically to the cur

Video Call on June 2, 2024

Several of the PMC members met yesterday to primarily discuss the ScopedContext and getting release 2.24.0 ready. The notes from that meeting are at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U7IXrgNYKX3aFE1IEVDmYradt5nxBn2NJM8P9_f1f0M/edit?usp=sharing. Ralph

Re: Video Call on June 2, 2024

I appreciate the update and the summary. Thanks all. > On Jun 3, 2024, at 22:55, Ralph Goers wrote: > > Several of the PMC members met yesterday to primarily discuss the > ScopedContext and getting release 2.24.0 ready. The notes from that meeting > are at > https://docs.google.com/documen