Hi all,
In a Slack discussion Volkan proposed (among other things) to:
* raise the Java requirements in 3.x to Java 17. It is the same
requirement as Spring Boot 3.x has, so I don't see a reason to lower
the bar. Besides Java 21 will be an LTS.
* deprecate some modules in 2.x and drop them in 3
Hi All.
> * raise the Java requirements in 3.x to Java 17.
+1 fine w/ me. FWIW, my day job is migrating from Java 11 to 17 ATM.
> * deprecate some modules in 2.x and drop them in 3.0.x, restore them if a
> user requests it in 3.1.x.
This feels arbitrary. First, we say 100k downloads, but then we
I agree with everything Gary says on this one. Furthermore, I still believe
some of these should move to their own repo.
Ralph
> On Sep 9, 2023, at 6:51 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Hi All.
>
>> * raise the Java requirements in 3.x to Java 17.
> +1 fine w/ me. FWIW, my day job is migrating f
Hi Gary,
On Sat, 9 Sept 2023 at 15:51, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > * raise the Java requirements in 3.x to Java 17.
> +1 fine w/ me. FWIW, my day job is migrating from Java 11 to 17 ATM.
Nice to hear that. IIRC you were on Java 8 for a long time.
> > * deprecate some modules in 2.x and drop them in
Please do not drop appserver, mongodb4, jdbc-dbcp2.
Gary
On Sat, Sep 9, 2023, 11:43 AM Piotr P. Karwasz
wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> On Sat, 9 Sept 2023 at 15:51, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > > * raise the Java requirements in 3.x to Java 17.
> > +1 fine w/ me. FWIW, my day job is migrating from Java 11 t
Hi Gary,
On Sat, 9 Sept 2023 at 18:07, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Please do not drop appserver, mongodb4, jdbc-dbcp2.
What part of `appserver` are you using: Tomcat or Jetty 9.x? Should we
keep Jetty 9.x support in 3.x (Jetty 10.x uses SLF4J and is not
Jakartified).
I like the way this is going, s
