it's not "mono vs multi (Git) repo setup" but "monolithic vs component-oriented
release"
longer explanation:
IMHO, you should frame the discussion about:
1. keeping unique global/monolithic release of all log4j
vs
2. splitting log4j into multiple parts/components released separately (with
depend
additional notice: on implementing component-oriented approach
from a tooling perspective, experience proves that the hard part is not at Git
level, but at generated Maven site level = how to replace a unique Maven site
for the monolithic release with a site that is a combination of multiple
co
Thanks for sharing your thoughts Herve, much appreciated!
Completely agree with you that the discussion should have rather focused on
the "monolithic vs component-oriented release" subject. Thanks for pointing
this out! (I am partly to blame for not capturing the context right.)
Regarding how to
How is this possible now that we use spotless in 2.x:
mvn clean install -pl log4j-api,log4j-core -DskipTests
[INFO]
[INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Log4j API 2.20.1-SNAPSHOT:
[INFO]
[INFO] Apache Log4j API
Hi Gary,
On Fri, 1 Sept 2023 at 14:19, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
>
> How is this possible now that we use spotless in 2.x:
It's a CRLF vs LF problem. About 6 months ago[1] I added a
`.gitattributes` file[2] that forces line endings as LF also on
Windows. This should solve two problems:
* approach
Ah! Excellent news, I'll give it a go.
Gary
On Fri, Sep 1, 2023, 11:21 AM Piotr P. Karwasz
wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> On Fri, 1 Sept 2023 at 14:19, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
> >
> > How is this possible now that we use spotless in 2.x:
>
> It's a CRLF vs LF problem. About 6 months ago[1] I added a
> `
Hi all,
I agree that the discussion should have been framed differently. It
immediately reminds me of a headache I never have: To pick up a new version
of Jetty, I just update a property in my POM. That's all I need to pick up
the 170 modules Jetty provides (not sure how many are jars). I know it'
That did not help but this sure does: -Dspotless.check.skip=true
Gary
On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 1:29 PM Gary Gregory wrote:
> Ah! Excellent news, I'll give it a go.
>
> Gary
>
> On Fri, Sep 1, 2023, 11:21 AM Piotr P. Karwasz
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Gary,
>>
>> On Fri, 1 Sept 2023 at 14:19, Gary D. Grego
Hi Piotr,
Thank you for your detailed response :-)
My comments are inline below.
On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 4:59 PM Piotr P. Karwasz
wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> May I offer a different perspective on this.
>
I knew that ;)
>
> On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 at 18:56, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > - I like a mon-re
