Perhaps we can keep the artifact id but advertise the module as something
besides “Log4j Core”? When introducing the hypothetical new name for the
module, we can include a parenthetical “AKA Log4j Core” to clarify.
—
Matt Sicker
> On Jun 22, 2023, at 10:12, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> Pretend for a
Hi Tim,
On Sat, 24 Jun 2023 at 22:00, Tim Perry wrote:
>
> Can we publish log4j-core so it spits out a deprecation warning and just
> pulls in log4j-impl or log4j-runtime or whatever?
This is probably the best solution.
We could also consider adding other dependencies to `log4j-core` that
were s
