Something like:
3.0 : Java 11
... Maintenance
~3.5 : Java 17
On Tue, Jun 6, 2023, 06:10 Gary Gregory wrote:
> Note that if we decide to go with Java 17 instead of 11, I won't stand in
> the way ;-)
>
> Gary
>
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2023, 06:09 Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> The case for maven is quite dif
If we continue with strong API compatibility in the API and various main areas,
then we can always bump the major version for those, too, or at least some
larger middle version jump. I can never remember which versions of Log4j 2.x
dropped support for various Java versions.
> On Jun 7, 2023, at
You know, all you have to do to figure out the JDK versions Log4j supports is
look at our web site.
Ralph
> On Jun 7, 2023, at 9:14 AM, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> If we continue with strong API compatibility in the API and various main
> areas, then we can always bump the major version for those,
