Hi,
On Mon, 5 Jun 2023 at 18:33, Matt Sicker wrote:
> Piotr raised an interesting question recently which deserves a dedicated
> thread here: what should our strategy be for supporting various versions of
> Java? Our current strategy is essentially Java 8 for 2.x and Java 11 for 3.x,
> but wit
The case for maven is quite different IMO because it is a development tool
and does not or should not affect the runtime requirements of the artifacts
built.
Gary
On Tue, Jun 6, 2023, 03:28 Piotr P. Karwasz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 5 Jun 2023 at 18:33, Matt Sicker wrote:
> > Piotr raised an in
Note that if we decide to go with Java 17 instead of 11, I won't stand in
the way ;-)
Gary
On Tue, Jun 6, 2023, 06:09 Gary Gregory wrote:
> The case for maven is quite different IMO because it is a development tool
> and does not or should not affect the runtime requirements of the artifacts
>
