Re: Reroute Dependabot emails to a separate separate list

Hi Volkan, On Mon, 6 Feb 2023 at 08:55, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > > You can configure dependabot to ignore certain major versions or update > types >

Re: Reroute Dependabot emails to a separate separate list

I wouldn't aim for an exhaustive list. Your compilation is better than what we have right now, which is nothing. If we encounter something new, we can extend this list. I think your changes could very well live in the official repository. I don't think the disruption is big enough to warrant work

Re: Reroute Dependabot emails to a separate separate list

I don’t want to get rid of the bot; it’s very useful. I just don’t want its notifications in my inbox, especially since they’re nearly impossible to filter without false positives (e.g., I can filter email from the bot itself, but then I still get emails from anyone here who interacts with the b

Re: Releases?

I have not committed the properties change; I did, however, back port some of the unrelated changes I had in there to master (though the recycler API update is still under review as we figure out if we can simplify that API first). I may need to restart some of the properties update into more di

Re: log4j-tools tags, checksums, JDK

He may be referring to the infra-enforced tag naming scheme where any tags prefixed with “rel/“ are immutable and cannot be deleted. If you start with a tag like `foo-1.2-rc1` and it passes a release vote, then you’d make an alias tag on that tag named `rel/1.2`. > On Feb 3, 2023, at 4:45 AM, V

Re: log4j-tools tags, checksums, JDK

I’m also a little confused. Volkan says he is creating the release tag during the CI release run. That won’t work as we should really avoid deleting tags created for releases. If the vote fails all that really should be done is to drop the artifacts from the Nexus staging repo. A new release bui

Re: log4j-tools tags, checksums, JDK

Okay, the mystery is solved. Matt has explained to me on Slack this documented-who-knows-where[1] feature about `rel/`-prefixed tags. I have updated the CI script and the release documentation , created

Re: log4j-tools tags, checksums, JDK

FWIW, the rel/ prefix is mentioned here: https://commons.apache.org/releases/release.html as well as on the pages of some other Apache projects. But not that you could have guessed to look there ;-) This was announced quite a while back on the infra ML IIRC but now I could not find it. Gary On