I would suggest that if a change were to be made it should follow the design
Log4j 2 uses and separate the configuration from the Logger instances. The
hierarchy in the configuration is likely to be much smaller than it is in the
Logger instances.
Ralph
> On Apr 1, 2020, at 10:06 AM, Robert Mi
Note: I wasn't involved with the design of this at all, but some thoughts:
Likely the reason this was done is because that's how log4j worked -
the classes that you see in log4cxx map closely to log4j(1) classes.
One of the problems involved with storing the level directly in the
logger would be a
I very much appreciate the great description of how to use log4cxx. My
question is about a design choice that affects performance (paragraph 2
in https://logging.apache.org/log4cxx/latest_stable/usage.html ). A
hierarchical approach for logging levels makes sense. However, each
run-time check
