Not breaking binary comparability (so leaving it as it is) is fine.
(Shameless plug) Every java main() method deserves http://picocli.info
> On Aug 22, 2017, at 0:32, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> To be clear, what is fine? Leaving it as is, or breaking Core BC and make
> the change from "set" to "w
To be clear, what is fine? Leaving it as is, or breaking Core BC and make
the change from "set" to "with" now?
Gary
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Remko Popma wrote:
> That's fine I think.
>
> (Shameless plug) Every java main() method deserves http://picocli.info
>
> > On Aug 18, 2017, at 7:1
That's fine I think.
(Shameless plug) Every java main() method deserves http://picocli.info
> On Aug 18, 2017, at 7:18, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> What I did not do is change the "set" methods to "with" to avoid breaking
> user sources. We should do that for 3.0 I think.
>
> Gary
>
>> On Thu, A
What I did not do is change the "set" methods to "with" to avoid breaking
user sources. We should do that for 3.0 I think.
Gary
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Remko Popma wrote:
> I like the idiom where setter methods return `this`, so users can chain
> methods; thanks for making that change.
I like the idiom where setter methods return `this`, so users can chain
methods; thanks for making that change.
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 5:41 AM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> Hi All and FYI:
>
> I plan on redoing the SocketOptions class as a real builder by making all
> accessors return this.
>
> Any o
Hi All and FYI:
I plan on redoing the SocketOptions class as a real builder by making all
accessors return this.
Any objections?
Gary
