I agree that compatibility is paramount for 2.x 😀
Gary
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024, 12:22 PM Ralph Goers
wrote:
> I have been working on creating log4j-context-data. My plan was to remove
> stuff from Log4j API after I have something workable. Even though 2.24.0
> won’t include log4j-context-data I wa
I have been working on creating log4j-context-data. My plan was to remove stuff
from Log4j API after I have something workable. Even though 2.24.0 won’t
include log4j-context-data I want to make sure that what we are leaving will be
compatible.
Ralph
> On Jun 20, 2024, at 4:15 AM, Gary Gregor
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 8:50 AM Piotr P. Karwasz
wrote:
>
> Hi Gary,
>
> On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 at 13:55, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > I'll give you all my -1 POV here:
>
> I share some of your concerns.
> My main motivation for this experiment with Develocity is not to save
> up CI time, but to improve
Hi Gary,
On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 at 13:55, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I'll give you all my -1 POV here:
I share some of your concerns.
My main motivation for this experiment with Develocity is not to save
up CI time, but to improve its responsiveness.
>From my contributions to other projects I learned t
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 7:37 AM Piotr P. Karwasz
wrote:
>
> Hi Gary,
>
>
> On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 at 13:15, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > I lost track of where we are after our video discussion regarding all the
> > scoped classes and 2.24.0. Where are we on those?
>
> From my part I didn't advance much,
Hi Gary,
On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 at 13:15, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I lost track of where we are after our video discussion regarding all the
> scoped classes and 2.24.0. Where are we on those?
>From my part I didn't advance much, since we are working hard on
reviewing and improving the documentation.
I lost track of where we are after our video discussion regarding all the
scoped classes and 2.24.0. Where are we on those?
Also, can we get information on what happened with the conference call
regarding the (IMO bad) idea on conditional testing? I sure hope we're not
using it.
Gary
On Tue, May
Probably discussions about the ScopedContext API in general.
> On May 26, 2024, at 14:49, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
>
>
>> On May 26, 2024, at 11:06 AM, Christian Grobmeier
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, May 25, 2024, at 04:22, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> I'd like to have the PMC meet to review and
> On May 26, 2024, at 11:06 AM, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, May 25, 2024, at 04:22, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> I'd like to have the PMC meet to review and discuss ScopedContext,
>> which I am not caught up on, and whatever else we should chat about.
>
> Me too.
>
> I feel tha
On Sat, May 25, 2024, at 04:22, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I'd like to have the PMC meet to review and discuss ScopedContext,
> which I am not caught up on, and whatever else we should chat about.
Me too.
I feel that all the discussion on the ScopedContext should be in an
experimental branch or an
I'd like to have the PMC meet to review and discuss ScopedContext,
which I am not caught up on, and whatever else we should chat about.
Gary
On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 2:11 PM Piotr P. Karwasz
wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
> On Fri, 24 May 2024 at 17:17, John Engebretson wrote:
> > The long-debated Scoped
Hi Ralph,
On Fri, 24 May 2024 at 22:50, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Thanks! Is there any chance you could provide some sample code we could use
> to perform performance testing? Based on your description I have a suspicion
> that ScopedContext would perform even better but at this point that is just
Thanks! Is there any chance you could provide some sample code we could use to
perform performance testing? Based on your description I have a suspicion that
ScopedContext would perform even better but at this point that is just
speculation without tests. Of course, that may be minimal and mig
Certainly! Our usage is widespread in our applications, and mostly
wrapped inside an internal logging/metrics library. Focusing on our most
performance-critical applications, our usage falls into two categories:
1. MDC sets/gets, ranging from 1 to 8 values at any given time.
2. CloseableThread
> On May 24, 2024, at 11:10 AM, Piotr P. Karwasz
> wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
> On Fri, 24 May 2024 at 17:17, John Engebretson wrote:
>> As
> I stated several times, 'ThreadContext.get()` is a mistake, because it
> allows users to abuse the API and transport logging-unrelated data
> through `Th
Hi John,
On Fri, 24 May 2024 at 17:17, John Engebretson wrote:
> The long-debated ScopedContext is not significant to us. Can
> we set a target date for 2.24.0? Perhaps by punting ScopedContext to a
> later date?
+1, the release of 2.24.0 is a blocker for:
* the release of a performance-optimi
Hi, my company is looking forward to the performance improvements
associated with 2.24.0 (specifically #2330). Most of our applications rely
on MDC or CloseableThreadContext and the performance benefits will be
widespread. The long-debated ScopedContext is not significant to us. Can
we set a ta
17 matches
Mail list logo
