Re: log4j-tools tags, checksums, JDK

FWIW, the rel/ prefix is mentioned here: https://commons.apache.org/releases/release.html as well as on the pages of some other Apache projects. But not that you could have guessed to look there ;-) This was announced quite a while back on the infra ML IIRC but now I could not find it. Gary On

Re: log4j-tools tags, checksums, JDK

Okay, the mystery is solved. Matt has explained to me on Slack this documented-who-knows-where[1] feature about `rel/`-prefixed tags. I have updated the CI script and the release documentation , created

Re: log4j-tools tags, checksums, JDK

I’m also a little confused. Volkan says he is creating the release tag during the CI release run. That won’t work as we should really avoid deleting tags created for releases. If the vote fails all that really should be done is to drop the artifacts from the Nexus staging repo. A new release bui

Re: log4j-tools tags, checksums, JDK

He may be referring to the infra-enforced tag naming scheme where any tags prefixed with “rel/“ are immutable and cannot be deleted. If you start with a tag like `foo-1.2-rc1` and it passes a release vote, then you’d make an alias tag on that tag named `rel/1.2`. > On Feb 3, 2023, at 4:45 AM, V

Re: Log4j-tools

I would prefer logging-log4j-server. Gary On Mon, Nov 28, 2022, 11:31 Ralph Goers wrote: > We currently have logging-log4j-tools which contains the log server code. > The log4j server isn’t really a tool so I would propose that the repo > either be renamed to logging-log4j-samples or logging-lo

Re: Log4j-tools

Hi Ralph, On Mon, 28 Nov 2022 at 17:31, Ralph Goers wrote: > > We currently have logging-log4j-tools which contains the log server code. The > log4j server isn’t really a tool so I would propose that the repo either be > renamed to logging-log4j-samples or logging-log4j-server. The pros and con

Re: log4j-tools release?

On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 11:51 PM Ralph Goers wrote: > > > > On Feb 12, 2020, at 9:25 PM, Christopher wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 7:01 PM Ralph Goers > > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>> On Feb 12, 2020, at 4:14 PM, Christopher wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>

Re: log4j-tools release?

> On Feb 12, 2020, at 9:25 PM, Christopher wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 7:01 PM Ralph Goers > wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Feb 12, 2020, at 4:14 PM, Christopher wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I noticed that the log4j2 SocketServer and related utilities were

Re: log4j-tools release?

On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 7:01 PM Ralph Goers wrote: > > > > > On Feb 12, 2020, at 4:14 PM, Christopher wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I noticed that the log4j2 SocketServer and related utilities were > > moved away from log4j-core and into log4j-tools awhile back. However, > > there hasn't been a rele

Re: log4j-tools release?

> On Feb 12, 2020, at 4:14 PM, Christopher wrote: > > Hi, > > I noticed that the log4j2 SocketServer and related utilities were > moved away from log4j-core and into log4j-tools awhile back. However, > there hasn't been a release of log4j-tools, as far as I can tell. Is > there any plan to do