Re: [log4j] Snowflake Appender

2023-05-15 Thread Piotr P. Karwasz
Hi Matt, On Mon, 15 May 2023 at 19:33, Matt Sicker wrote: > > It could make sense for us to maintain a list of third party plugins on our > site, though, especially if we want to offload any other plugins like that to > third parties. That is on my TODO list. As part of the documentation reva

Re: [log4j] Snowflake Appender

2023-05-15 Thread Piotr P. Karwasz
Hi Matt, On Mon, 15 May 2023 at 19:33, Matt Sicker wrote: > > It could make sense for us to maintain a list of third party plugins on our > site, though, especially if we want to offload any other plugins like that to > third parties.

Re: [log4j] Snowflake Appender

2023-05-15 Thread Matt Sicker
It could make sense for us to maintain a list of third party plugins on our site, though, especially if we want to offload any other plugins like that to third parties. > On May 11, 2023, at 5:20 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Pawel, > > Your best bet is to provide this code in your own GitHub (

Re: [log4j] Snowflake Appender

2023-05-11 Thread Gary Gregory
Just don't use an Apache group ID in your maven coordinates. Gary On Thu, May 11, 2023, 19:14 Piotr P. Karwasz wrote: > Hi Paweł, > > On Thu, 11 May 2023 at 21:59, Pawel Urbanowicz > wrote: > > I would like to contribute to log4j by implementing the Snowflake > appender > > which will use Snow

Re: [log4j] Snowflake Appender

2023-05-11 Thread Piotr P. Karwasz
Hi Paweł, On Thu, 11 May 2023 at 21:59, Pawel Urbanowicz wrote: > I would like to contribute to log4j by implementing the Snowflake appender > which will use Snowpipe Streaming > . > WDYT about my idea for contributio

Re: [log4j] Snowflake Appender

2023-05-11 Thread Gary Gregory
Pawel, Your best bet is to provide this code in your own GitHub (or GitLab, or wherever) repository and publish to Maven Central. This will give you the freedom of providing features, bug fixes, and releases as you best see fit. Gary On Thu, May 11, 2023, 16:01 Pawel Urbanowicz wrote: > Hello

Re: [log4j] Snowflake Appender

2023-05-11 Thread Ralph Goers
In the past I have proposed that some of the similar components in Log4j be moved into their own separate Git repos. I would only be in favor of accepting this if that were the case. Ralph > On May 11, 2023, at 12:50 PM, Pawel Urbanowicz > wrote: > > Hello, > > I would like to contribute to