Re: [log4j] ProGuard support in `log4j-api`

2024-01-11 Thread Gary Gregory
It feels wrong to add support for a special development time tool in our runtime. Gary On Thu, Jan 11, 2024, 1:58 PM Ralph Goers wrote: > Yeah - if we add it to the code base that implies that we are testing it. > I really don’t want to be in the position where we start adding > customizations

Re: [log4j] ProGuard support in `log4j-api`

2024-01-11 Thread Ralph Goers
Yeah - if we add it to the code base that implies that we are testing it. I really don’t want to be in the position where we start adding customizations for every tool a user might be using. This is very much in line with our not wanting to keep adding more and more integrations . Ralph > On J