Hi Remko! Just saying "Hi".
Gary
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024, 1:40 AM Remko Popma wrote:
> I’m open to improvements in this area.
>
> Before going into details or specifics though, I’m curious:
>
> What do we (users, developers and PMC members) consider to be the “value
> proposition” of Log4j? Why sh
I’m open to improvements in this area.
Before going into details or specifics though, I’m curious:
What do we (users, developers and PMC members) consider to be the “value
proposition” of Log4j? Why should people choose Log4j over the alternatives?
This is a positioning question; what are the
We should IMO keep this information available _somewhere_, maybe in a new
stable historical-archival section of the site. I'm not a fan of using the
wiki because that's yet another place to look for information and it feels
transitory, unstable (as far as information permanance), and more like
some
