Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4net 2.0.16

2024-03-08 Thread Davyd McColl
Hi Gary I receive on the order of a hundred or more emails every day. Searches fail me, at least in Thunderbird. I will rather just keep a record as they come in, but thanks for the suggestion. -d On 08 March 2024 17:09:13 Gary Gregory wrote: You don't need memory, if you deleted the mes

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4net 2.0.16

2024-03-08 Thread Gary Gregory
You don't need memory, if you deleted the messages already from your email app, go to lists.apache.org Gary On Fri, Mar 8, 2024, 8:59 AM Davyd McColl wrote: > Hi Gary > > > I'll try to remember that for the future. From memory now, there was > only one person who had any holdups and that was d

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4net 2.0.16

2024-03-08 Thread Piotr P. Karwasz
Hi Davyd, On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 14:59, Davyd McColl wrote: > > I'll try to remember that for the future. From memory now, there was > only one person who had any holdups and that was due to outdated build > docs from me - so it should be resolved. There were no -1's, and at > least 4 +1's that I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4net 2.0.16

2024-03-08 Thread Davyd McColl
Hi Gary I'll try to remember that for the future. From memory now, there was only one person who had any holdups and that was due to outdated build docs from me - so it should be resolved. There were no -1's, and at least 4 +1's that I saw. I'll try to keep better tally next time. -d On 2

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4net 2.0.16

2024-03-08 Thread Gary Gregory
Process: You need to reply to this thread with a [RESULT] prefix, tally all the votes, and say whether the vote passes or not. It is helpful to note which votes are binding or not. Gary On Fri, Mar 8, 2024, 6:06 AM Davyd McColl wrote: > Hi all > > > Thanks for all the checking - log4net 2.0.16

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4net 2.0.16

2024-03-08 Thread Davyd McColl
Hi all Thanks for all the checking - log4net 2.0.16 is out in the wild now (: -d On 2024/03/08 00:02, Jan Friedrich wrote: Hello Gary, the errors are in the examples project for .net compact framework (which is no longer supported by microsoft): C:\Users\ggregory\rc\apache-log4net-source-

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4net 2.0.16

2024-03-07 Thread Davyd McColl
Thanks for trying, Gary. I need to update the docs, I think, because I dropped client profile framework targets with the last release (iirc) because of that exact problem - can't install like that any more. You really just need the latest dotnet ask (8) and .net from windows features (including

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4net 2.0.16

2024-03-07 Thread Jan Friedrich
Hello Gary, the errors are in the examples project for .net compact framework (which is no longer supported by microsoft): C:\Users\ggregory\rc\apache-log4net-source-2.0.16\examples\netcf\1.0\Tutorials\ConsoleApp\cs\src\ConsoleApp.csdproj(23,1): error MSB4075: The project file "C:\Users\ggrego

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4net 2.0.16

2024-03-07 Thread Gary D. Gregory
I've failed to build probably because the machine I am doing this on is DNS locked down for security and can only access certain sites. I was able to install install-dotnet-core-sdk-1.1.ps1 but not install-net-framework-sdk-3.5.ps1 (Error 0x800F0954 in a dialog that points to https://learn.micr

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4net 2.0.16

2024-03-06 Thread Robert Middleton
+1 Verified the following: * apache-log4net-source-2.0.16.zip and associated sha/signature * apache-log4net-binaries-2.0.16.zip and associated sha/signature It looks all good to me. -Robert Middleton On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 1:20 AM Ralph Goers wrote: > > +1 > > Verified signatures > Verified ha

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4net 2.0.16

2024-03-04 Thread Ralph Goers
+1 Verified signatures Verified hashes Verified License and Notice files. Note - the copyright year should be the first year the code was created. You can update it to include “-(currentYear}” but that is not strictly necessary. Ralph > On Mar 4, 2024, at 10:48 AM, Jan Friedrich wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4net 2.0.16

2024-03-04 Thread Jan Friedrich
+1 Unit tests on my machine were successful. We integrated the new version into our test environment and all manual tests were successful. Jan > +1 > Verified signatures. > Verified hashes. > `NOTICE` contains 2022 as the copyright year, but I don't find it a > blocker. (I have fixed it in `m

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4net 2.0.16

2024-03-04 Thread Volkan Yazıcı
+1 Verified signatures. Verified hashes. `NOTICE` contains 2022 as the copyright year, but I don't find it a blocker. (I have fixed it in `master`.) On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 2:19 PM Davyd McColl wrote: > Hi all > > > This is the vote to release Apache log4net version 2.0.16 > > > Website: > http

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4net 2.0.16

2024-03-01 Thread Davyd McColl
Hi Volkan That was my whole point with the question on my release vote: I have put things in svn, bit I'm not seeing them at the url you've posted. I assume I've done something wrong, but I don't know what and need someone to help. I must admit my svn-fu is rubbish so perhaps I just messed up

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4net 2.0.16

2024-03-01 Thread Volkan Yazıcı
Davyd, I am afraid it cannot qualify an official vote if the [source] distribution artifacts are missing. This is the whole point of the ASF release ceremony. Binary artifacts, Website, GitHub, VCS, Nuget, etc. can be the most important mediums for you and/or the project, though they are irrelevant