Adding my +1.
With that, the release passes with 3 binding +1 votes from Piotr, Matt, and
me. I will continue the release process.
On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 10:29 AM Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
> This is a vote to release the Apache Log4j Tools 0.5.0 (RC2).
>
> Website: https://logging.staged.apache.org/
+1
I should note that the included `mvnw` script is not executable in the zip.
> On Oct 3, 2023, at 3:29 AM, Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
>
> This is a vote to release the Apache Log4j Tools 0.5.0 (RC2).
>
> Website: https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4j/tools
> GitHub: https://github.com/apache/log
Hi Volkan,
On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 at 10:29, Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
> Please download, test, and cast your votes on this mailing list.
>
> [ ] +1, release the artifacts
> [ ] -1, don't release, because...
I checked:
* the source archive for the reproducibility of the build,
* the git commit for repro
I am cancelling this vote (due to reasons stated in the thread) and
will issue an RC2 promptly.
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 1:13 PM Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
>
> This is a vote to release the Apache Log4j Tools 0.5.0.
>
> Source repository: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-tools
> Commit: 861b03c70
Hi Volkan,
On Mon, 2 Oct 2023 at 10:22, Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
> Fixed (and tested!) this in `logging-parent`.
> We will do a `logging-parent` version `10.1.1` release first.
> Consequently issue an RC2 for `-tools` version `0.5.0`.
The bug that prevented files with a timestamp equal to 0 from bei
Fixed (and tested!) this in `logging-parent` to use
`project.build.outputTimestamp` instead. Since distribution code is shipped
by `logging-parent`, we will do a `logging-parent` version `10.1.1` release
first. Consequently issue an RC2 for `-tools` version `0.5.0`.
On Sun, Oct 1, 2023 at 4:50 PM
Fixed (and tested!) this in `logging-parent`.
We will do a `logging-parent` version `10.1.1` release first.
Consequently issue an RC2 for `-tools` version `0.5.0`.
On Sun, Oct 1, 2023 at 2:16 PM Gary Gregory wrote:
> One day this will work in my fantasy world:
>
> shasum --check apache-log4j-too
Hi Gary,
On Sun, 1 Oct 2023 at 14:20, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> [Note to reviewers: You MUST review a src package, not a git tag.]
>
> -1: Failure running 'mvn clean verify'
Nice catch.
The problem comes from the modification date of each file in the
source archive (i.e. start of the epoch).
In t
[Note to reviewers: You MUST review a src package, not a git tag.]
-1: Failure running 'mvn clean verify'
mvn clean verify
Apache Maven 3.9.4 (dfbb324ad4a7c8fb0bf182e6d91b0ae20e3d2dd9)
Maven home: /usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.9.4/libexec
Java version: 17.0.8.1, vendor: Homebrew, runtime:
/usr/local/
One day this will work in my fantasy world:
shasum --check apache-log4j-tools-0.5.0-src.zip.sha512
shasum: apache-log4j-tools-0.5.0-src.zip.sha512: no properly formatted
SHA checksum lines found
;-)
Gary
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 5:03 PM Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
>
> +1
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 29,
+1
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023, at 13:13, Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
> This is a vote to release the Apache Log4j Tools 0.5.0.
>
> Source repository: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-tools
> Commit: 861b03c70a76ca19408ffc8c4a77bc0c4e5e4570
> Distribution: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging
+1
> On Sep 29, 2023, at 6:13 AM, Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
>
> This is a vote to release the Apache Log4j Tools 0.5.0.
>
> Source repository: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-tools
> Commit: 861b03c70a76ca19408ffc8c4a77bc0c4e5e4570
> Distribution: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/loggi
12 matches
Mail list logo
