Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j Tools 0.1.0

2023-01-13 Thread Volkan Yazıcı
Adding my +1. With that, the release passes with 4 binding +1 votes from me, Piotr, Matt, and Remko. On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 11:55 AM Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > The Apache Log4j Tools 0.1.0 release is now available for voting. > > The 0.1.0 version is the very first release of this relatively old >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j Tools 0.1.0

2023-01-11 Thread Remko Popma
+1 On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 2:21 AM Matt Sicker wrote: > +1 > > Thanks for working on this! Looks great! > > > On Jan 10, 2023, at 4:55 AM, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > > > > The Apache Log4j Tools 0.1.0 release is now available for voting. > > > > The 0.1.0 version is the very first release of this r

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j Tools 0.1.0

2023-01-11 Thread Matt Sicker
+1 Thanks for working on this! Looks great! > On Jan 10, 2023, at 4:55 AM, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > > The Apache Log4j Tools 0.1.0 release is now available for voting. > > The 0.1.0 version is the very first release of this relatively old > repository, which is repurposed for `log4j-changelog`,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j Tools 0.1.0

2023-01-10 Thread Piotr P. Karwasz
Hi Volkan, On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 at 11:54, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > Nexus repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachelogging-1096 > Signing key: > https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?search=077e8893a6dcc33dd4a4d5b256e73ba9a0b592d0&fingerprint=on&op=index The hashe

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j Tools 0.1.0

2023-01-10 Thread Gary Gregory
Ah, I see, the author of https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/ is not a native English speaker, and shares the same French background as I do, maybe it explains it, regardless, if that's what we want to do, so be it. Gary On Tue, Jan 10, 2023, 07:05 Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > The rationale was expla

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j Tools 0.1.0

2023-01-10 Thread Volkan Yazıcı
The rationale was explained in the `log4j-changelog` README: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-tools/blob/master/log4j-changelog/README.adoc In a nutshell, we stick to the https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/ specification. I share the same grammatical concern, yet, it might be better to sti

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j Tools 0.1.0

2023-01-10 Thread Gary Gregory
Curious: In the "classic" changelog, we use "add", "fix", and so on, simple enough. Here, we use the past tense "added", and so on, except that we don't use "secured", we use "security", an odd inconsistency I guess. Any reason for that? FWIW, I like the simpler shorter words "add" and so on. Ga