Here is my own +1
With that, this vote passes with 5x +1 from:
Volkan Yazici
Piotr Karawasz
Gary Gregory
Ralph Goers
Christian Grobmeier
I will proceed with the following steps soon
Thanks to everybody who voted!
Christian
On Fri, Oct 13, 2023, at 11:08, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> This is a
+1
My first attempt at building from the source failed with
[ERROR]
SyslogAppenderCustomLayoutTest>SyslogAppenderTest.testUDPAppender:80->SyslogAppenderTestBase.sendAndCheckLegacyBsdMessage:75->SyslogAppenderTestBase.checkTheNumberOfSentAndReceivedMessages:113
The number of received messages
Well guess what? Yesterday was Fri 13. I wonder if that confuses the test.
Ralph
> On Oct 14, 2023, at 9:02 AM, Piotr P. Karwasz wrote:
>
> Hi Gary,
>
> On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 at 13:56, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
>>
>> I just ran mvn clean verify and I think I need a new machine ;-) I took...
>> 1
Hi Gary,
On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 at 13:56, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
>
> I just ran mvn clean verify and I think I need a new machine ;-) I took... 13
> hours?
This happened also on the CI yesterday (for the first time in several
months IIRC):
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/actions/runs/650
I just ran mvn clean verify and I think I need a new machine ;-) I took... 13
hours?
[INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Log4j BOM 2.21.0:
[INFO]
[INFO] Apache Log4j BOM ... SUCCESS [ 22.553 s]
[INFO] Apache Log4j Parent SUCCESS [ 1.
Hi all,
On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 at 12:16, Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
>
> ✔ Binaries
> ✔ Sources
> ✔ Website (incl. Javadocs)
> 𐄂 Website URL[1]
> ✔ Signatures
> ✔ Checksums
>
> +1
Same here:
* the binaries in the binary archive, Maven repo and locally
generated are identical. Somehow `log4j-perf` made it
✔ Binaries
✔ Sources
✔ Website (incl. Javadocs)
𐄂 Website URL[1]
✔ Signatures
✔ Checksums
+1
Thanks for taking care of the release Christian!
[1] Christian's recent Jekyll experiment on the `asf-staging` branch
of `logging-site` repository confused the INFRA and it is acting
strangely. This will
