gt; > >> those
> > >>> languages have some form of compile time macros (or at least Scala
> does,
> > >> as
> > >>> does Groovy). Though that could even fill in the location info
> directly
> > >>> rather than walking the call stack at ru
gt; On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 12:24, Ralph Goers
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Yes.
> >>>>
> >>>> Ralph
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Jun 22, 2019, at 9:54 AM, Gary Gregory
> >>>> wrote:
> >
n Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 12:24, Ralph Goers
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes.
>>>>
>>>> Ralph
>>>>
>>>>> On Jun 22, 2019, at 9:54 AM, Gary Gregory
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I would dro
t; >
> > > > On Jun 22, 2019, at 9:54 AM, Gary Gregory
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I would drop prefixes like "at" and "with".
> > > >
> > > > In you example, if debug logging is disabled, are the follow
> On Jun 22, 2019, at 9:54 AM, Gary Gregory
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I would drop prefixes like "at" and "with".
> > >
> > > In you example, if debug logging is disabled, are the follow up calls
> > noops?
> > >
noops?
> >
> > Gary (AFK)
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 22, 2019, 11:58 Ralph Goers
> wrote:
> >
> >> Please review the PR for LOG4J2-2639 at
> >> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/284 <
> >> https://github.com/apache/logging-l
Yes.
Ralph
> On Jun 22, 2019, at 9:54 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> I would drop prefixes like "at" and "with".
>
> In you example, if debug logging is disabled, are the follow up calls noops?
>
> Gary (AFK)
>
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2019, 11:58 Ral
I would drop prefixes like "at" and "with".
In you example, if debug logging is disabled, are the follow up calls noops?
Gary (AFK)
On Sat, Jun 22, 2019, 11:58 Ralph Goers wrote:
> Please review the PR for LOG4J2-2639 at
> https://github.com/apache/logging
Please review the PR for LOG4J2-2639 at
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/284
<https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/284>. This adds new Logger
methods to allow a builder pattern to be used to accumulate the parameters to a
logging call before logging the event. I go
