Re: PR#72 build failure.

2017-04-24 Thread Gary Gregory
On Apr 20, 2017 11:43 AM, "Matt Sicker" wrote: We have it set up as a convenience for PRs, though in theory we could make Jenkins do it instead. The ASF has a policy of using our own resources for most things, so I don't think we can even use Travis as our primary CI anyways. Apache delivers bi

Re: PR#72 build failure.

2017-04-24 Thread Chandra
Perfect. thanks Matt! Hopefully, more PRs in the future :) thanks, Chandra On 24 Apr 2017, 12:59 PM +0530, Matt Sicker , wrote: > Thanks for the PR! I've gone and remerged it to make sure GitHub was > updated properly as well. > > On 20 April 2017 at 13:47, Chandra wrote: > > > Sounds good and

Re: PR#72 build failure.

2017-04-24 Thread Matt Sicker
Thanks for the PR! I've gone and remerged it to make sure GitHub was updated properly as well. On 20 April 2017 at 13:47, Chandra wrote: > Sounds good and I *really* like the auto tagging of PR/s with Jira. > > Not sure how ASF works, at least I haven’t been any real contributor to > any Apache

Re: PR#72 build failure.

2017-04-20 Thread Chandra
Sounds good and I *really* like the auto tagging of PR/s with Jira. Not sure how ASF works, at least I haven’t been any real contributor to any Apache projects _yet_. log4j2 seemed to be a good start! thanks, Chandra On 21 Apr 2017, 12:14 AM +0530, Matt Sicker , wrote: > We have it set up as a

Re: PR#72 build failure.

2017-04-20 Thread Matt Sicker
We have it set up as a convenience for PRs, though in theory we could make Jenkins do it instead. The ASF has a policy of using our own resources for most things, so I don't think we can even use Travis as our primary CI anyways. As for the Scala module there, we're almost ready to migrate them in

Re: PR#72 build failure.

2017-04-20 Thread Chandra
lol, I digged in a little bit, seems to be the issue of OOM. [INFO] Apache Log4j Scala 2.11 wrapper for Log4j API .. FAILURE [ 29.531 s] ... [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-jar-plugin:3.0.0:jar (default-jar) on project log4j-api-scala_2.11: Error assembling JA

Re: PR#72 build failure.

2017-04-20 Thread Matt Sicker
That was a Travis build failure, right? That system is even less reliable than our normal Jenkins system. On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 20:01, Chandra wrote: > Yeah. I believe you. was just wondering why the all build failures. ;) > > thanks, > Chandra > > On 20 Apr 2017, 5:33 AM +0530, Matt Sicker ,

Re: PR#72 build failure.

2017-04-19 Thread Chandra
Yeah. I believe you. was just wondering why the all build failures. ;) thanks, Chandra On 20 Apr 2017, 5:33 AM +0530, Matt Sicker , wrote: > Don't worry about the build failure. We can still merge it. :) > > On 19 April 2017 at 00:43, Chandra wrote: > > > Hi List, > > > > I had a minor update on

Re: PR#72 build failure.

2017-04-19 Thread Matt Sicker
Don't worry about the build failure. We can still merge it. :) On 19 April 2017 at 00:43, Chandra wrote: > Hi List, > > I had a minor update on the documentation for which I sent a pull request. > Not sure what happened but, the travis build failed. > I see a lot of build failures from the PRs,

PR#72 build failure.

2017-04-19 Thread Chandra
Hi List, I had a minor update on the documentation for which I sent a pull request. Not sure what happened but, the travis build failed. I see a lot of build failures from the PRs, any reason for that? Here’s my pull request. https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/72 thanks, Chandra

PR#72 build failure.

2017-04-18 Thread Chandra
Hi List, I had a minor update on the documentation for which I sent a pull request. Not sure what happened but, the travis build failed. I see a lot of build failures from the PRs, any reason for that? Here’s my pull request. https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/72 thanks, Chandra