Re: Making compression extensible

First, and foremost, we don’t want Log4j to have required dependencies. So whatever the JDK supports out of the box we need to take advantage of. Whatever it doesn’t, I agree we should delegate that to Apache Commons. Ralph > On Jun 18, 2023, at 12:00 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > I agree with

Re: Making compression extensible

I agree with Volkan, we should not accept a one-off. Instead, I would prefer we generically support whatever Apache Commons Compress supports. I can help beef up Compress if we need anything in there to make Log4j better. Gary On Sun, Jun 18, 2023, 14:52 Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > Recently, somebod

Making compression extensible

Recently, somebody asked for zstd compression . I indicated that adding zstd would be nice, but ideally we should make the compression extensible [by means of plugins]. As usual, even though I offered PR assistance, the user has individually sub