Re: Logging list for emails generated by tools

2017-10-16 Thread Ralph Goers
All Jira, Jenkins and GitHub notifications should now be going to notificati...@logging.apache.org . Please subscribe and adjust your email setup. Ralph > On Oct 16, 2017, at 7:23 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > So mailto:notifications-subscr...@logging.ap

Re: Logging list for emails generated by tools

2017-10-16 Thread Gary Gregory
So mailto:notifications-subscr...@logging.apache.org to subscribe... Gary On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 7:53 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > The mailing list notificati...@logging.apache.org notificati...@logging.apache.org> has been created. All committers should > subscribe. > > Ralph > > > On Oct 15, 20

Re: Logging list for emails generated by tools

2017-10-16 Thread Ralph Goers
The mailing list notificati...@logging.apache.org has been created. All committers should subscribe. Ralph > On Oct 15, 2017, at 3:22 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > It seems there is a self-service tool to create the mailing list. > > Ralph > >> On Oct

Re: Logging list for emails generated by tools

2017-10-15 Thread Ralph Goers
It seems there is a self-service tool to create the mailing list. Ralph > On Oct 15, 2017, at 3:15 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > I have opened a Jira issue with Infra to do this. > > Ralph > >> On Oct 13, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Mikael Ståldal wrote: >> >> Sounds like a good idea. >> >> >> On 201

Re: Logging list for emails generated by tools

2017-10-15 Thread Ralph Goers
I have opened a Jira issue with Infra to do this. Ralph > On Oct 13, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Mikael Ståldal wrote: > > Sounds like a good idea. > > > On 2017-10-12 22:34, Ralph Goers wrote: >> What do others think about the idea of creating a separate mailing list for >> emails generated by tools

Re: Logging list for emails generated by tools

2017-10-13 Thread Mikael Ståldal
Sounds like a good idea. On 2017-10-12 22:34, Ralph Goers wrote: What do others think about the idea of creating a separate mailing list for emails generated by tools? This list gets a bit noisy from all the extra emails and I have a hard time filtering this list because of how some of the em

Re: Logging list for emails generated by tools

2017-10-13 Thread Matt Sicker
We haven't really discussed the use of gitbox in this project yet, so that's not an issue right now. What we do have is a sync between PR comments to the mentioned JIRA ticket, and that generates duplicate emails as it is. On 13 October 2017 at 01:56, Daan Hoogland wrote: > I don’t know if loggi

Re: Logging list for emails generated by tools

2017-10-12 Thread Daan Hoogland
I don’t know if logging is a gitbox project but keep in mind that also a lot of the github discussions will disappear if you do this. On 13/10/2017, 00:56, "Remko Popma" wrote: I think that's a good idea. (I really wish we could have fewer duplicate emails though.) Remko

Re: Logging list for emails generated by tools

2017-10-12 Thread Remko Popma
I think that's a good idea. (I really wish we could have fewer duplicate emails though.) Remko > On Oct 13, 2017, at 6:59, Dominik Psenner wrote: > > Stuff that requires human intervention should stay prominent. The rest can > go away. :-) > > 2017-10-12 23:06 GMT+02:00 Ralph Goers : > >> I

Re: Logging list for emails generated by tools

2017-10-12 Thread Dominik Psenner
Stuff that requires human intervention should stay prominent. The rest can go away. :-) 2017-10-12 23:06 GMT+02:00 Ralph Goers : > It will also make the quarterly board reports more accurate. > reporter.apache.org provides the number of emails received on the list > during the quarter. In my view

Re: Logging list for emails generated by tools

2017-10-12 Thread Ralph Goers
It will also make the quarterly board reports more accurate. reporter.apache.org provides the number of emails received on the list during the quarter. In my view, having the GitHub, Jira, Jenkins, etc emails on the dev list skews things as they dominate they number of “real” discussion emails

Re: Logging list for emails generated by tools

2017-10-12 Thread Matt Sicker
If it makes email filter rules easier to configure, I'd say go for it. It'd be just like the commits@ list though with floods of emails coming in every so often that I just have to skip over (e.g., rebasing a long lived branch). On 12 October 2017 at 15:45, Gary Gregory wrote: > I do not care ei

Re: Logging list for emails generated by tools

2017-10-12 Thread Gary Gregory
I do not care either way. Gary On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > What do others think about the idea of creating a separate mailing list > for emails generated by tools? This list gets a bit noisy from all the > extra emails and I have a hard time filtering this list because

Logging list for emails generated by tools

2017-10-12 Thread Ralph Goers
What do others think about the idea of creating a separate mailing list for emails generated by tools? This list gets a bit noisy from all the extra emails and I have a hard time filtering this list because of how some of the emails are generated. I would also say that we expect every committe