Since there's no central repository of C++ libraries (or C, or several
other languages for that matter; Rust providing one is a nice change
of pace), it'll be fairly difficult to get real usage stats about what
minimum compiler versions and such are still in use out there. Now I
know it's not the "
Guten Tag Robert Middleton,
am Sonntag, 23. August 2020 um 03:31 schrieben Sie:
> I'm working on changes for log4cxx at the moment that involve upgrades to
> use C++11 features; that would definitely require a major change in the
> versioning, although the API would be largely the same.
OTOH, the
That is for those involved in the C++ development to decide but I would wonder
a) Besides updating the compiler are there other architectural improvements
that should be made.
b) How much will the code diverge - would it be possible to share the code that
is in common somehow or would that just g
I'm working on changes for log4cxx at the moment that involve upgrades to
use C++11 features; that would definitely require a major change in the
versioning, although the API would be largely the same. Part of the
question with that as well is what platforms and compilers are supported,
as Thorste
I would completely support that change.
On Sun, Aug 23, 2020, 3:14 AM Ralph Goers
wrote:
> In looking at the log4cxx changelog I can’t help notice that the first
> release was 17 years ago. After all these years one would expect that the
> version should have hit 1.0.0 at least 10-15 years ago.
In looking at the log4cxx changelog I can’t help notice that the first release
was 17 years ago. After all these years one would expect that the version
should have hit 1.0.0 at least 10-15 years ago. Isn’t it time to correct that?
Ralph
