Hi Ralph,
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 at 15:33, Ralph Goers wrote:
> > Maybe we should replace the links on the web page? There are actually
> > people (like me and probably you) that don't download everything
> > through the browser.
> > What do you think?
>
> Replace them with what? We are required to u
> On Mar 1, 2024, at 6:55 AM, Piotr P. Karwasz wrote:
>
> Hi Piers,
>
> On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 at 14:14, Piers Uso Walter wrote:
>> Thanks for the quick response.
>> And yes, everything is OK on your side.
>>
>> I did indeed somehow manage to download the HTML file as the zip archive.
>> That e
Hi Piers,
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 at 14:14, Piers Uso Walter wrote:
> Thanks for the quick response.
> And yes, everything is OK on your side.
>
> I did indeed somehow manage to download the HTML file as the zip archive.
> That explains why the checksum was wrong.
>
> How embarrassing:-(
I did the ex
Hi Piotr,
Thanks for the quick response.
And yes, everything is OK on your side.
I did indeed somehow manage to download the HTML file as the zip archive.
That explains why the checksum was wrong.
How embarrassing:-(
With kind regards
Piers
> Am 01.03.2024 um 13:55 schrieb Piotr P. Karwasz :
Hi Piers,
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 at 13:33, Piers Uso Walter wrote:
> I downloaded log4j 2.23.0 from
> https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/download.html
> Specifically I downloaded
> https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/logging/log4j/2.23.0/apache-log4j-2.23.0-bin.zip
>
> The checksum file
> http
Hi,
I downloaded log4j 2.23.0 from
https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/download.html
Specifically I downloaded
https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/logging/log4j/2.23.0/apache-log4j-2.23.0-bin.zip
The checksum file
https://www.apache.org/dist/logging/log4j/2.23.0/apache-log4j-2.23.0-bin.zip.
