On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> I added my little sales pitch. This goes back to the other goal I had in
> mind while experimenting with a Log4j Boot idea: emphasis on log4j-api as a
> logging facade. I feel like we could do better in our "marketing message"
> regarding both
I added my little sales pitch. This goes back to the other goal I had in
mind while experimenting with a Log4j Boot idea: emphasis on log4j-api as a
logging facade. I feel like we could do better in our "marketing message"
regarding both log4j-api and log4j-core being separate.
On 2 May 2017 at 13
Hi all,
A while back, I ported Apache HttpComponents [1] HttpClient's trunk from
Apache Commons Logging to Log4j 2 for the upcoming HttpClient 5 Alpha
release. This was discussed and approved of the ML of course. Now, one
developer is making a fuss.
I'd like some help from our community explainin
