On 2017-04-27, Dominik Psenner wrote:
> I just noticed that log4net has a html version of the website
> committed at svn as a sibling of trunk at [1]. Stefan, you did some
> commits there back in 2012. I assume that the content is obsolete and
> we don't mind if that content is not available on th
Hi,
I just noticed that log4net has a html version of the website committed
at svn as a sibling of trunk at [1]. Stefan, you did some commits there
back in 2012. I assume that the content is obsolete and we don't mind if
that content is not available on the git repository. Is this correct?
C