Re: [log4j2] Legacy docs

I did not realize the sites were archived. That's great. We only need to document that fact and link. Gary On Jun 25, 2017 21:57, "Ralph Goers" wrote: The Legacy section on the left nav bar contains a link for Log4j 1.x and Log4j 2.3. These two releases (and sites) have special significance. No

Re: [log4j2] Legacy docs

The Legacy section on the left nav bar contains a link for Log4j 1.x and Log4j 2.3. These two releases (and sites) have special significance. No other releases do. They should not be lost in a sea of other releases. Plus, it would make that left navigation extremely long. Although all the previo

Re: [log4j2] Legacy docs

Hi, You're talking about something different, the change reports are one thing, the site is another. I am thinking of users that are stuck on an old random release either by direct or transitive dependency. Using the site that matches their version would be quite helpful. No urgent of course. Ga

Re: [log4j2] Legacy docs

I only created that so people would be able to find release 2.3 if they needed to use Java 6. My fear is that if we add all the releases there then that will get lost in the noise. BTW - all the releases are listed at http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/changes-report.html

[log4j2] Legacy docs

Hi All, We have a nice "Legacy" section of our site. I think we should track every release there. 2c, Gary