Gary, this really doesn’t make sense.
Now If I do:
MapMessage msg = new MapMessage<>();
msg.with(“count”, 5);
msg.with(“amount”, 1.01);
msg.with(“text”, “Hello”);
Map map = msg.getData();
I am going to get back a Map where all the values are Strings because getData()
has cast them to Strings wh
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 10:47 AM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 12:33 AM, Ralph Goers
> wrote:
>
>> Then I don’t understand why you modified MapMessage to be
>>
>> public class MapMessage, V>
>> and the getData method returns has the signature
>>
>> public Map getData()
>>
>> If
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 12:33 AM, Ralph Goers
wrote:
> Then I don’t understand why you modified MapMessage to be
>
> public class MapMessage, V>
> and the getData method returns has the signature
>
> public Map getData()
>
> If you are putting arbitrary stuff in the Map then this signature is wro
Then I don’t understand why you modified MapMessage to be
public class MapMessage, V>
and the getData method returns has the signature
public Map getData()
If you are putting arbitrary stuff in the Map then this signature is wrong.
Ralph
> On Jan 11, 2018, at 11:29 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
Hi Ralph,
I will have to look at the generics in the morning but my requirement from
day one is that a MapMessage allow values of any type (String keys are
fine.) where each value in a MapMessage can be of a different types. A
specific Appender can decide what to do with the values. Having all Str
In looking at the history MapMessage only supported Strings until you modified
it last June. It appears to me you did it incorrectly. You made MapMessage
generic but left the put and putAll methods as only supporting String values. I
am not sure why you would have done that instead of having the
I can use one of the with() methods so no big deal.
Gary
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 4:23 PM, Ralph Goers
wrote:
> I will have to look but as I recall I did that for a reason.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Jan 11, 2018, at 3:37 PM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> >
> > It seems to me that:
> >
> > org.
I will have to look but as I recall I did that for a reason.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 11, 2018, at 3:37 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> It seems to me that:
>
> org.apache.logging.log4j.message.MapMessage.put(String, String)
>
> should really be:
>
> org.apache.logging.log4j.message.MapMessa
It seems to me that:
org.apache.logging.log4j.message.MapMessage.put(String, String)
should really be:
org.apache.logging.log4j.message.MapMessage.put(String, Object)
Thoughts?
Gary
