Re: [log4j] ProGuard support in `log4j-api`

It feels wrong to add support for a special development time tool in our runtime. Gary On Thu, Jan 11, 2024, 1:58 PM Ralph Goers wrote: > Yeah - if we add it to the code base that implies that we are testing it. > I really don’t want to be in the position where we start adding > customizations

Re: [log4j] ProGuard support in `log4j-api`

Yeah - if we add it to the code base that implies that we are testing it. I really don’t want to be in the position where we start adding customizations for every tool a user might be using. This is very much in line with our not wanting to keep adding more and more integrations . Ralph > On J

[log4j] ProGuard support in `log4j-api`

ProGuard – a GPL2-licensed, widely used JAR optimizer and obfuscator in the Android world – doesn't work with `log4j-api` out of the box. In summary, since Log4j uses reflection, ProGuard needs to be configured to avoid removing certain Log4j classes. A use