Re: [log4j] Doc improvement proposal

2017-07-08 Thread Matt Sicker
Makes sense to me. That could've been a historical issue because the JMS appender used to be two plugins (queue and topic). On 8 July 2017 at 23:15, Gary Gregory wrote: > Hi All, > > In the docs, we talk about the "JMSAppender" but nowhere except for XML > examples do we mention that the configu

[log4j] Doc improvement proposal

2017-07-08 Thread Gary Gregory
Hi All, In the docs, we talk about the "JMSAppender" but nowhere except for XML examples do we mention that the configuration element name is actually "JMS" and not "JMSAppender". I'm going to replace "JMSAppender" with "JMS Appender" in the docs to make that point. Feel free to update other appe