Re: [log4cxx] Release review kit

+1 I have: - checked the SHA512 checksums - checked for unexpected changes in the list of files in the 1.2.0.tar.gz archive compared to the 1.1.0.tar.gz release archive - built on Windows using each compressed archive (using two conan recipes) - built and tested a suite of applications using log4c

Re: [log4cxx] Release review kit

Thanks for the prompt response Robert. Appreciated the pointers. Log4cxx docs are indeed helpful. But a little bit more guidance in the vote email could be helpful. See that two other people (Piotr and Matt) quickly reviewed the release after my email sharing the steps I followed

Re: [log4cxx] Release review kit

1. staging website was in the email 2/3: I use this script to verify things. Feel free to adapt for your own purposes: https://gist.github.com/rm5248/b2abba4bb4f1d9cf518be49d064a0be1 4. Build instructions are on the website: https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4cxx/latest_stable/build-cmake.html

[log4cxx] Release review kit

I would really appreciate a "review kit" for voting on log4cxx releases: 1. Where is the staging website? 2. How can I verify the checksum? 3. How can I verify the signatures? 4. How can I build and test the sources? (For inspiration, you can check out the review kit we use for Java-b