Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 2.0.14

Thanks Matt, then I'd consider this vote closed and the release ready to go as soon as I get to it (probably the end of the week). Thanks to everyone who double-checked me. -d On December 29, 2021 02:23:16 Matt Sicker wrote: Yeah, you can close the vote before releasing. -- Matt Sicker O

Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 2.0.14

Yeah, you can close the vote before releasing. -- Matt Sicker > On Dec 28, 2021, at 16:11, Davyd McColl wrote: > > Hi Matt, I'm happy to, just need to get the time to do the actually release > (: holiday mode has kicked in good and proper. Can I close out before I > release? > > -d > > > On

Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 2.0.14

Hi Matt, I'm happy to, just need to get the time to do the actually release (: holiday mode has kicked in good and proper. Can I close out before I release? -d On December 28, 2021 21:37:21 Matt Sicker wrote: Seems like we have enough votes to complete this release. Davyd, would you like t

Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 2.0.14

Seems like we have enough votes to complete this release. Davyd, would you like to close the vote? -- Matt Sicker > On Dec 25, 2021, at 14:50, Remko Popma wrote: > > +1 > > On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 6:35 AM Ralph Goers > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> I checked the signature and hashes and those look g

Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 2.0.14

+1 On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 6:35 AM Ralph Goers wrote: > +1 > > I checked the signature and hashes and those look good. > > I unzipped the source and binaries. The appropriate license and notice > files are present. > > I did not perform tests as I don’t have the necessary tools installed. > > Ra

Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 2.0.14

+1 I checked the signature and hashes and those look good. I unzipped the source and binaries. The appropriate license and notice files are present. I did not perform tests as I don’t have the necessary tools installed. Ralph > On Dec 23, 2021, at 1:36 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > Root key

Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 2.0.14

Root keys are in https://downloads.apache.org/logging/KEYS which is in the dist repository where you commit releases. On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 2:03 AM Dominik Psenner wrote: > > * old-log4net.snk.gpg has been the old key to sign binaries. > * @Matt, where is the root logging KEYS file located? > >

Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 2.0.14

* old-log4net.snk.gpg has been the old key to sign binaries. * @Matt, where is the root logging KEYS file located? The changes in the release look good to me. +1 On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 at 07:34, Davyd McColl wrote: > Thanks Matt > > Since you've given a +1, I'll write up some sticky notes to addre

Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 2.0.14

Thanks Matt Since you've given a +1, I'll write up some sticky notes to address these points in the near future. -d On December 19, 2021 23:51:45 Matt Sicker wrote: +1 Notes on the release: * I’ve copied your release signing key to the root logging KEYS file for easier discoverability.

Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 2.0.14

+1 Notes on the release: * I’ve copied your release signing key to the root logging KEYS file for easier discoverability. * The copyright year in the NOTICE file is a few years out of date at this point. I’ve updated this in master, though you’ll want to update this again in a couple weeks when

Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 2.0.14

I’ve added Davyd’s key to the logging KEYS file. It appears I had already signed it a while back but hadn’t copied it to this KEYS file already. Do note that his key was available in https://downloads.apache.org/logging/log4net/KEYS which isn’t

Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 2.0.14

I think Matt or somebody would just have to add your key to the KEYS file. Otherwise, I have validated the checksums and the key, so +1 from me. I did not validate that anything builds, as I don't do .NET. -Robert Middleton On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 5:53 AM Davyd McColl wrote: > > Hi Robert > > I

Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 2.0.14

Hi Robert I checked and saw the same sha discrepencies - the only reason I can think of is perhaps I interrupted a release script such that I had updated artifacts but interrupted before the shas were computed. Fixed-up now, thanks for the heads-up. Just to be sure, I've updated the release art

Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 2.0.14

Hi Dominik The staging site is updated. Really only release notes and download links changed - no api changes, so no sdk doc changes. -d On December 17, 2021 10:02:45 Dominik Psenner wrote: Hi Davyd, I checked the changes since 2.0.13 and it looks good to me. Have you also updated the lo

Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 2.0.14

Hi Davyd, I checked the changes since 2.0.13 and it looks good to me. Have you also updated the log4net site? I would like to verify that the log4net website looks good in staging. Cheers Dominik On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 at 15:09, Davyd McColl wrote: > Hi all > > I'd like to raise a vote to release

Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 2.0.14

Hi Robert Binaries are signed with my key, though I remember someone raising that my key wasn't in a known area last time, so I'd appreciate help with that. I had a key signing party with Ralph and Matt quite a long time ago, but perhaps there's something I was supposed to do that I didn't ):

Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 2.0.14

> I have updated staging docs and I _think_ I've done the right thing with > respect to getting binaries and source up to the dev repo at > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging, but the download links on > the staging docs point to the release download area, so I'm not sure if I > should

[VOTE] Release log4net 2.0.14

Hi all I'd like to raise a vote to release log4net 2.0.14. Changelog is up on the pre-release page at  https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rc%2F2.0.14-rc1 I have updated staging docs and I _think_ I've done the right thing with respect to getting binaries and source up to the

[VOTE] Release log4net 2.0.14

Hi all I'd like to raise a vote to release log4net 2.0.14. Changelog is up on the pre-release page at https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rc%2F2.0.14-rc1 I have updated staging docs and I _think_ I've done the right thing with respect to getting binaries and source up to the de