Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j Kotlin API 1.2.0-rc3

2021-12-29 Thread Matt Sicker
Yes, not a bad idea. I’m going to cancel this vote to roll a fourth release candidate. I’ll also try to fix the site style bug on the components pages (might just need to remove the custom styling and use a default maven-site-plugin theme). -- Matt Sicker > On Dec 29, 2021, at 03:22, Gary Grego

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j Kotlin API 1.2.0-rc3

2021-12-29 Thread Gary Gregory
I agree w Volkan here as well. Gary On Wed, Dec 29, 2021, 02:53 Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > Shall we cancel this, upgrade to 2.17.1, and revote? > > On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 5:02 AM Matt Sicker wrote: > > > This is a vote to release Log4j Kotlin API version 1.2.0, the next > version > > of the Kotli

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j Kotlin API 1.2.0-rc3

2021-12-28 Thread Volkan Yazıcı
Shall we cancel this, upgrade to 2.17.1, and revote? On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 5:02 AM Matt Sicker wrote: > This is a vote to release Log4j Kotlin API version 1.2.0, the next version > of the Kotlin facade for Log4j2. > > Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers list. > [

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j Kotlin API 1.2.0-rc3

2021-12-28 Thread Matt Sicker
Gentle reminder. -- Matt Sicker > On Dec 21, 2021, at 15:21, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Is it possible that RAT is only configured for reporting and not invocation > from a build? The log4j RAT passes. > > Gary > > > > On Tue, Dec 21, 2021, 16:12 Matt Sicker > wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j Kotlin API 1.2.0-rc3

2021-12-21 Thread Gary Gregory
Is it possible that RAT is only configured for reporting and not invocation from a build? The log4j RAT passes. Gary On Tue, Dec 21, 2021, 16:12 Matt Sicker wrote: > The jquery.js file has a license header; I have no idea why rat complains > about it. And these two files are copied verbatim f

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j Kotlin API 1.2.0-rc3

2021-12-21 Thread Matt Sicker
The jquery.js file has a license header; I have no idea why rat complains about it. And these two files are copied verbatim from log4j2, so I don’t see the issue here. I looked at the rat report on the site and it looked fine, too. -- Matt Sicker > On Dec 21, 2021, at 14:55, Gary Gregory wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j Kotlin API 1.2.0-rc3

2021-12-21 Thread Gary Gregory
The RAT check (mvn apache-rat:check) fails on: src/site/resources/js/jquery.min.js src/site/resources/js/jquery.js If it is indeed ok to ship these files, then the RAT check should exclude these files and the NOTICE file be updated with an appropriate entry. I know this is not the runtime, it

[VOTE] Release Log4j Kotlin API 1.2.0-rc3

2021-12-20 Thread Matt Sicker
This is a vote to release Log4j Kotlin API version 1.2.0, the next version of the Kotlin facade for Log4j2. Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers list. [] +1, release the artifacts [] -1, don't release because... The vote will remain open for 24 hours (or more if req