This vote has passed with +1 votes from Gary Gregory, Matt Sicker, Volkan
Yazici, Carter Kozak and Ralph Goers. There were no other votes.
I will continue with the release process.
Ralph
My +1
Ralph
> On Mar 8, 2021, at 9:24 AM, Carter Kozak wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Verified the snapshots in a few internal projects, as well as code review and
> tests on the tag.
>
> Test pass on ubuntu:
> $ mvn clean && mvn install
>
> /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64/bin/java -version
> openj
+1
Verified the snapshots in a few internal projects, as well as code review and
tests on the tag.
Test pass on ubuntu:
$ mvn clean && mvn install
/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64/bin/java -version
openjdk version "11.0.10" 2021-01-19
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.10+9-Ubuntu-0ubu
Thanks so much Ralph, I can indeed view
https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/json-template-layout.html
https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/layouts.html#JsonTemplateLayout
still misses the correction I have shared, but not a big issue.
I can clean it up later on.
On Sun
Json-Template-layout is available in the staging site now.
Ralph
> On Mar 7, 2021, at 2:16 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> I will rebuild the site and update that one file.
>
> Ralph
>
>> On Mar 7, 2021, at 2:13 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>
>> The generated site contains json-template-layout.vm.htm
I will rebuild the site and update that one file.
Ralph
> On Mar 7, 2021, at 2:13 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> The generated site contains json-template-layout.vm.html in the manual
> directory. I see json-template-layout.vm.adoc in the source, which I suspect
> is the source of the problem. I
The generated site contains json-template-layout.vm.html in the manual
directory. I see json-template-layout.vm.adoc in the source, which I suspect is
the source of the problem. I believe the file needs to be named
json-template-layout.adoc.vm to be processed by velocity and end up with an
adoc
Ah! If that is the case, definitely +1! (Sorry for the inconvenience.)
On Sun, 7 Mar 2021, 22:06 Gary Gregory wrote:
> I don't think we need to fail the RC if the site generation is the only
> item impacted as opposed to the running software since its relatively easy
> to fix the site after the
Sorry I won't have time to validate the release.
But it looks like there are enough +1 votes to proceed, phew! :-)
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 5:58 AM Ralph Goers
wrote:
> See - https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MDOAP/issues/MDOAP-61. This
> is documented as part of the release process.
>
> I d
I should always add that something wrong with the web site would never be a -1
on a release vote. The web site can be updated at any time and doesn’t really
require a vote. We tend to only update it at the time of release do to features
being added or changes being made, but I have corrected mis
I don't think we need to fail the RC if the site generation is the only
item impacted as opposed to the running software since its relatively easy
to fix the site after the release. Up to the RM of course ;-)
Gary
On Sun, Mar 7, 2021, 15:58 Ralph Goers wrote:
> See - https://issues.apache.org/
Yes, that is from the website. Build the website with "./mvnw site", browse
to "Layouts" and click to "JSON Template Layout" from the menu on the left.
It used to work. Note that this might be a hiccup on my side too, hence I
will really appreciate a confirmation.
On Sun, 7 Mar 2021, 21:58 Ralph G
See - https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MDOAP/issues/MDOAP-61. This is
documented as part of the release process.
I don’t understand the impact of the missing json-template-layout.html. Is
that from the web site? Was it present in 2.14.0 and why is it missing now?
Ralph
> On Mar 7, 20
-1, due to missing `json-template-layout.html` file!
`./mvnw site` fails for me thanks to maven-doap-plugin:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-doap-plugin:1.2:generate (site) on project
log4j: Execution site of goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-doap-plugin:1.2:genera
+1
Tested on macOS with Java 8. Didn't try compiling with newer Java as
the default due to known issues with some hard-coded things.
Signatures good, build and tests good.
On Sun, 7 Mar 2021 at 08:48, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Testing using the git tag for this RC:
>
> - mvn RAT check OK.
>
+1
Testing using the git tag for this RC:
- mvn RAT check OK.
- mvn clean install OK.
- mvn revapi:check -pl log4j-api OK.
- mvn revapi:check -pl log4j-1.2-api fails but with what looks like
non-1.2 changes.
Tested using:
Macos:
openjdk version "1.8.0_282"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (AdoptOpe
This is a vote to release Log4j 2.14.1, the next version of the Log4j 2 project.
Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers list.
[] +1, release the artifacts
[] -1, don't release because...
The vote will remain open for 72 hours (or more if required). All votes are
welco
17 matches
Mail list logo
