The release vote has passed with binding +1 votes from Matt Sicker, Gary
Gregory, Carter Kozak, Ralph Goers and Remko Popma. An addition +1 vote was
received from Marius Vokhart.
Thank you all for reviewing and voting on the release.
I will continue with the release process.
Ralph
+1
> On Feb 29, 2020, at 8:33, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> My +1
>
> Ralph
>
>> On Feb 25, 2020, at 10:38 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>
>> This is a vote to release Log4j 2.13.1, the next version of the Log4j 2
>> project.
>>
>> Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers
My +1
Ralph
> On Feb 25, 2020, at 10:38 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> This is a vote to release Log4j 2.13.1, the next version of the Log4j 2
> project.
>
> Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers list.
> [] +1, release the artifacts
> [] -1, don't release because...
>
+1
Tested on several internal products including internal logging fixture
benchmarks, everything looks good.
Ralph, thank you for all the work you put into releases, I really appreciate it!
-ck
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020, at 09:56, Marius Volkhart wrote:
> +1. Thanks for fixing the dependencies and a
+1. Thanks for fixing the dependencies and all the work that goes into
these releases!
--
Cheers,
Marius Volkhart
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 2:16 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
> +1
>
> My review is based on the git tag.
>
> Running 'mvn -V clean package' OK with:
>
> Apache Maven 3.6.3 (cecedd343002696
> On Feb 26, 2020, at 6:16 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> +1
>
> My review is based on the git tag.
>
> Running 'mvn -V clean package' OK with:
>
> Apache Maven 3.6.3 (cecedd343002696d0abb50b32b541b8a6ba2883f)
> Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.6.3\bin\..
> Java version: 1.8.0_241, vendor: O
+1
My review is based on the git tag.
Running 'mvn -V clean package' OK with:
Apache Maven 3.6.3 (cecedd343002696d0abb50b32b541b8a6ba2883f)
Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.6.3\bin\..
Java version: 1.8.0_241, vendor: Oracle Corporation, runtime: C:\Program
Files\Java\jdk1.8.0_241\jre
Default l
* Signatures good
* Builds and tests pass
* Site looks good
+1
On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 13:38, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> False alarm; turns out it was only failing while connected to VPN.
> Tests pass when using a normal network.
>
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 11:46, Matt Sicker wrote:
> >
> > System in
False alarm; turns out it was only failing while connected to VPN.
Tests pass when using a normal network.
On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 11:46, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> System info:
>
> openjdk version "1.8.0_222"
> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (Zulu 8.40.0.25-CA-macosx) (build 1.8.0_222-b10)
> OpenJDK 64-
System info:
openjdk version "1.8.0_222"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (Zulu 8.40.0.25-CA-macosx) (build 1.8.0_222-b10)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (Zulu 8.40.0.25-CA-macosx) (build 25.222-b10,
mixed mode)
I also tried running it with 11, but I got different errors in the test:
openjdk version "11.0.
Yes, our web site is very large. It isn’t required that we distribute it but I
always like to.
That test failure is not something I have encountered nor seen in the Jenkins
builds.
Ralph
> On Feb 26, 2020, at 10:26 AM, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> Has the site zip always been so large? 331 MB.
>
Has the site zip always been so large? 331 MB.
I'm getting a recurring test failure for
"SocketReconnectTest.testReconnect:151 No Exception thrown" in
log4j-core
On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 at 23:38, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> This is a vote to release Log4j 2.13.1, the next version of the Log4j 2
> projec
This is a vote to release Log4j 2.13.1, the next version of the Log4j 2 project.
Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers list.
[] +1, release the artifacts
[] -1, don't release because...
The vote will remain open for 72 hours (or more if required). All votes are
welco
13 matches
Mail list logo
