This vote passed with +1 votes from Matt Sicker, Carter Kozak, Remko Popma,
Ralph Goers, and Gary Gregory. There were no other votes.
I will continue with the release.
Ralph
+1
Minor hassle with log4j-Cassandra discussed elsewhere.
Gary
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021, 13:28 Ralph Goers wrote:
> My +1
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Dec 14, 2021, at 11:26 AM, Remko Popma wrote:
> >
> > +1 very light validation but ran a simple test program against the
> binaries
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 15,
My +1
Ralph
> On Dec 14, 2021, at 11:26 AM, Remko Popma wrote:
>
> +1 very light validation but ran a simple test program against the binaries
>
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 3:19 AM Carter Kozak wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> validated the build and signatures, tests in core modules.
>>
>> On Tue, Dec
+1 very light validation but ran a simple test program against the binaries
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 3:19 AM Carter Kozak wrote:
> +1
>
> validated the build and signatures, tests in core modules.
>
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2021, at 00:58, Ralph Goers wrote:
> > This is a vote to release Log4j 2.12.2, a
+1
validated the build and signatures, tests in core modules.
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021, at 00:58, Ralph Goers wrote:
> This is a vote to release Log4j 2.12.2, a security release for Java 7 users.
>
> Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers list.
> [] +1, release the artifa
FTR, here the crash, even after updating FailSafe to the current 3.0.0-M5:
#
# A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
#
# SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x00010805ec4c, pid=27510, tid=0x3d03
#
# JRE version: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (8.0_312) (build
1.8.0_31
Fails all the time :-( from that point on using 'mvn clean install -V -rf
log4j-cassandra', digging...
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 11:00 AM Gary Gregory
wrote:
> My local build got further but failed dramatically:
>
> [INFO] Apache Log4j Cassandra . FAILURE [
> 4.748 s]
My local build got further but failed dramatically:
[INFO] Apache Log4j Cassandra . FAILURE [
4.748 s]
...
[INFO]
[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
--
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 10:42 AM Ralph Goers
wrote:
> Great. But I still need to back port the security fix.
>
Sure, I just want it to build here as a sanity check (my sanity that is), I
know yours is good :-)
Gary
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Dec 14, 2021, at 8:36 AM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> >
> > Th
Great. But I still need to back port the security fix.
Ralph
> On Dec 14, 2021, at 8:36 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> This problem was a red herring for me, my ${java:runtime} string was
> wrapping due to length and the test did not account for that. I updated the
> branch and I am building local
This problem was a red herring for me, my ${java:runtime} string was
wrapping due to length and the test did not account for that. I updated the
branch and I am building locally to see if I can go through a whole build...
Gary
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 6:06 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
> After checking
Sorry, I can't get `log4j-2.12.2-rc1` tag compiling.
Downloading:
https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-remote-resources-plugin/1.5/maven-remote-resources-plugin-1.5.pom
[INFO]
[INFO] Reactor Sum
After checking out the tag (git status says 'HEAD detached at
log4j-2.12.2-rc1') and running 'mvn clean install' with Java 8 and Maven
3.8.4, I get:
[INFO] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
0.351 s - in org.apache.logging.log4j.MarkerMixInJsonTest
[INFO]
[INFO] Results
+1
Builds fine, sigs good, etc.
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 11:58 PM Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> This is a vote to release Log4j 2.12.2, a security release for Java 7 users.
>
> Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers list.
> [] +1, release the artifacts
> [] -1, don't release
This is a vote to release Log4j 2.12.2, a security release for Java 7 users.
Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers list.
[] +1, release the artifacts
[] -1, don't release because...
The vote will remain open for as short amount as time as required to vet the
release.
15 matches
Mail list logo
