Adding my +1.
With that, the release passes with 3 binding +1 votes from Piotr, Ralph,
and me.
I will proceed with publishing the release.
On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 11:29 PM Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
> This is a vote to release the Apache Log4j Tools 0.4.0.
>
> Source repository: https://github.com/apa
I thought I voted +1 on this but I don’t see the email. In case I didn’t hear
it is again.
Ralph
> On Jul 5, 2023, at 9:37 AM, Piotr P. Karwasz wrote:
>
> Hi Volkan,
>
> On Mon, 3 Jul 2023 at 23:29, Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
>>
>> This is a vote to release the Apache Log4j Tools 0.4.0.
>>
>> So
Hi Volkan,
On Mon, 3 Jul 2023 at 23:29, Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
>
> This is a vote to release the Apache Log4j Tools 0.4.0.
>
> Source repository: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-tools
> Commit: 15d888fe488660b0bb5d3fc3e95c9915f277fbee
> Distribution: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/l
Created LEGAL-647[1].
Note that INFRA recommends[2] and explains[3] this technique too.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-647
[2] https://infra.apache.org/release-publishing.html#signing
[3] https://infra.apache.org/release-signing.html#automated-release-signing
On Tue, Jul 4, 2023
Closed the Nexus repo.
Will create a JIRA ticket for the Legal to update the release policy.
On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 8:20 AM Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> I have verified the artifact in the distribution directory. It looks fine.
>
> I am hesitant to vote on this though as you have not closed the releas
Indeed I should have had an RC2 in the email subject, my mistake. All
the rest of the information is correct. Due to the difference in the
shared commit IDs, it is clear that this VOTE email and the previous
one don't point to the same release, even though RC2 is not explicitly
mentioned. I propose
I have verified the artifact in the distribution directory. It looks fine.
I am hesitant to vote on this though as you have not closed the release in the
Nexus repo at repository.apache.org, which means you can still add stuff to
that. Once you close that I will vote on this.
I am still concer
IMO the email subject and text MUST contain the RC number. It's a small
change that makes a huge difference.
Gary
On Mon, Jul 3, 2023, 18:33 Ralph Goers wrote:
> I am confused. We had a vote thread for 0.4.0. Did you close that vote?
> Maybe I just didn’t get that email again.
>
> The commit t
I am confused. We had a vote thread for 0.4.0. Did you close that vote? Maybe I
just didn’t get that email again.
The commit tag for this vote is not the same as the previous commit tag. So is
this really rc-2? I despise having multiple release vote threads for the same
release number as it is
This is a vote to release the Apache Log4j Tools 0.4.0.
Source repository: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-tools
Commit: 15d888fe488660b0bb5d3fc3e95c9915f277fbee
Distribution: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4j
Signing key: 0x077e8893a6dcc33dd4a4d5b256e73ba9a0b592d0
Plea
10 matches
Mail list logo
