Adding my +1.
With that, the release passes with 3 binding +1 votes from me, Piotr, and Ralph.
(Gary, I will address your concerns in another thread.)
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 6:19 PM Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
>
> The Apache Log4j Tools 0.2.0 release is now available for voting.
>
> This release cont
Yes, the tools require Java 11 to build. That should have been obvious by the
“Unrecognized option: —add exports” message.
Ralph
> On Feb 2, 2023, at 7:53 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Warning: I am frustrated.
>
> I'm not going to -1 this but I'm not going to +1 because it is a giant
> pain to
Warning: I am frustrated.
I'm not going to -1 this but I'm not going to +1 because it is a giant
pain to build without deleting a bunch of files from the source zip
file.
There are HIDDEN and not hidden Maven files/folders in there? Why? I
f*k hate it when downloads try to take over my tooling.
Another minor note: Doubling SHA checksums seems over-the-top in
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4j/ I'd stick to
512.
Gary
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 12:18 PM Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
>
> The Apache Log4j Tools 0.2.0 release is now available for voting.
>
> This release contains the
A minor note: The tags don't look to me like they are named properly.
In other projects, I see and do, for example:
someartifact-1.0.2-rc1 is the tag for an RC
rel/someartifact-1.0.2 is the tag for the release where infra makes
rel/ tags read-only, at least I'm pretty sure they do.
Having a tag f
+1
Verified signature and checksum. Also verified the Maven plugins work with
Log4j 2.
One note however, is that the signing key used has not has note been signed by
any of us so isn’t exactly trustworthy. We all should sign the key.
Ralph
> On Jan 31, 2023, at 10:19 AM, Volkan Yazıcı wrote
Very sharp of you Piotr! Thanks for reviewing the changes thoroughly.
`0.1.0` in the XSD is not a mistake. I used different versions for the
XSD, which resembles more of an API, and the project itself, since
they are independent.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 11:32 PM Piotr P. Karwasz
wrote:
>
> Hi Vol
Hi Volkan,
The signatures are correct and the build is reproducible: +1.
On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 at 18:18, Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
> * Added XSD for `log4j-changelog` XML files
Just a reminder: if the vote passes, the XSD must be published under
https://logging.apache.org/log4j/changelog-0.1.0.xsd (sh
The Apache Log4j Tools 0.2.0 release is now available for voting.
This release contains the following changes:
* Fixed Windows compatibility
* Fixed unreleased directory order in `ChangelogExporter`
* Removed security as a change type from `log4j-changelog`
* Added XSD for `log4j-changelog` XML f
