Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j 2.3.1-rc1 for Java 6

2021-12-21 Thread Tim Perry
I was able to build on Windows 10, with Zulu Java 6. On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 1:29 PM Remko Popma wrote: > +1 I am changing my vote. > My earlier pipecleaning program failed because the config had a JmsAppender > configured in it... My bad. > Signatures are good. > Pipecleaning program works on J

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j 2.3.1-rc1 for Java 6

2021-12-21 Thread Remko Popma
+1 I am changing my vote. My earlier pipecleaning program failed because the config had a JmsAppender configured in it... My bad. Signatures are good. Pipecleaning program works on Java 6 when I remove the JmsAppender from the config. On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 6:23 AM Ralph Goers wrote: > My +1 >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j 2.3.1-rc1 for Java 6

2021-12-21 Thread Ralph Goers
My +1 I tested it in an Ubuntu VM and verified it with Java 6. Ralph > On Dec 20, 2021, at 10:18 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > This is a vote to release Log4j 2.3.1, a security release for Java 6 users. > > Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers list. > [] +1, release

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j 2.3.1-rc1 for Java 6

2021-12-21 Thread Carter Kozak
+1 rat and build succeed, however I don't have a jre6 around to test with. Apache Maven 3.6.3 Maven home: /usr/share/maven Java version: 1.8.0_282, vendor: Azul Systems, Inc., runtime: /home/ckozak/.tools/jdk/zulu8.52.0.23-ca-jdk8.0.282-linux_x64/jre Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j 2.3.1-rc1 for Java 6

2021-12-21 Thread Matt Sicker
+1 Signatures good, build good, artifacts good. -- Matt Sicker > On Dec 20, 2021, at 23:18, Ralph Goers wrote: > > This is a vote to release Log4j 2.3.1, a security release for Java 6 users. > > Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers list. > [] +1, release the artif

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j 2.3.1-rc1 for Java 6

2021-12-21 Thread Gary Gregory
+1 I did the same steps as Rob but I only used Java 8: - mvn apache-rat:check -DskipTests - mvn clean install - mvn site -DskipTests openjdk version "1.8.0_312" OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_312-bre_2021_10_20_23_15-b00) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.312-b00, mixed mode) Apache M

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j 2.3.1-rc1 for Java 6

2021-12-21 Thread Ron Grabowski
+1 I wrote a simple HelloWorld app with 2.3.1 running on jdk1.6.0_45 to further verfiy LOG4J2-3198. These commands ran successfully too: mvn clean install mvn site -DskipTests mvn apache-rat:check -DskipTests Apache Maven 3.8.4 (9b656c72d54e5bacbed989b64718c159fe39b537) Maven home: C:\project

Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j 2.3.1-rc1 for Java 6

2021-12-21 Thread Gary Gregory
I will report on the build I started before I left the house, but I won't be back for an hour or two. Gary On Tue, Dec 21, 2021, 13:29 Ralph Goers wrote: > I have installed Java 6 in an Ubuntu VM and created a simple all that just > logs Hello, world!. I had no problem running it in Java 6 wit

[DISCUSS] [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j 2.3.1-rc1 for Java 6

2021-12-21 Thread Ralph Goers
I have installed Java 6 in an Ubuntu VM and created a simple all that just logs Hello, world!. I had no problem running it in Java 6 with the 2.3.1 api and core jars. Remko, if you want to do a screen share I’d be happy to demo it. Ralph > On Dec 21, 2021, at 7:15 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j 2.3.1-rc1 for Java 6

2021-12-21 Thread Ralph Goers
You should try 2.3. I bet you get the same result. I bet we enhanced the plugin system to ignore plugins that get NoClassDefFoundError. Ralph > On Dec 21, 2021, at 6:41 AM, Remko Popma wrote: > > Gary, > > No it’s literally that pipe cleaning class, the api and core jar, and a > Log4j2.xml w

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j 2.3.1-rc1 for Java 6

2021-12-21 Thread Remko Popma
Gary, No it’s literally that pipe cleaning class, the api and core jar, and a Log4j2.xml with just the console Appender. That should work though without any extra dependencies. Interestingly the same setup does work without errors with 2.12.3 on Java 7. What’s the difference between 2.3.1 a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j 2.3.1-rc1 for Java 6

2021-12-21 Thread Gary Gregory
Remko: JMS is not built-in the JRE, do you have JMS in your configuration for this test? If you do, then you'd need the JMS API and a provider as dependencies. Gary On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 7:37 AM Ralph Goers wrote: > > Hmmm. This is not what I was expecting. If it didn’t work I would have > e

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j 2.3.1-rc1 for Java 6

2021-12-21 Thread Ralph Goers
Hmmm. This is not what I was expecting. If it didn’t work I would have expected bad class version exceptions. Ralph > On Dec 21, 2021, at 4:28 AM, Remko Popma wrote: > > -1 it does not work... > > Problem running a simple pipecleaning test on Java 6 with 2.3.1... > My pipecleaning program is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4j 2.3.1-rc1 for Java 6

2021-12-21 Thread Remko Popma
-1 it does not work... Problem running a simple pipecleaning test on Java 6 with 2.3.1... My pipecleaning program is something simple like this public class Pipecleaning { public static void main(String[] args) { org.apache.logging.log4j.LogManager.getLogger().info("HELLO USER ${sys:u

[VOTE] Release Apache Log4j 2.3.1-rc1 for Java 6

2021-12-20 Thread Ralph Goers
This is a vote to release Log4j 2.3.1, a security release for Java 6 users. Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers list. [] +1, release the artifacts [] -1, don't release because... The vote will remain open for as short amount as time as required to vet the release.