Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Log4cxx 1.3.0

2024-10-18 Thread Robert Middleton
Thanks for getting the release out, it's good that we're getting more automated about it. -Robert Middleton On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 2:12 AM Stephen Webb wrote: > > and here is my +1. > > With that the vote passed with 3 +1 votes from Piotr and Robert and myself. > I will continue the release pro

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Log4cxx 1.3.0

2024-10-17 Thread Stephen Webb
and here is my +1. With that the vote passed with 3 +1 votes from Piotr and Robert and myself. I will continue the release process. Stephen --- This is a vote to release the Apache Log4cxx 1.3.0.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4cxx 1.3.0

2024-10-16 Thread Stephen Webb
The Conan package manager (a leading C++ package manager) uses Sha256. On Wed, 16 Oct 2024, 11:11 pm Gary Gregory, wrote: > I think it's a bit confusing to have both 256 and 512 sha files. We > shouldn't imo give the impression that you should check both. One is plenty > imo, 512. > > Gary > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4cxx 1.3.0

2024-10-16 Thread Gary Gregory
I think it's a bit confusing to have both 256 and 512 sha files. We shouldn't imo give the impression that you should check both. One is plenty imo, 512. Gary On Wed, Oct 16, 2024, 7:05 AM Robert Middleton wrote: > Notes(none of these are blockers): > * Fuzzing page doesn't render > correctly(h

[log4cxx] Fuzzers page doesn't render correctly (Was: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4cxx 1.3.0)

2024-10-16 Thread Volkan Yazıcı
Thanks for the heads up, Robert! Fixed in eaab90254946715f690e60d5b33f15eca43dcefd . On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 1:06 PM Robert Middleton wrote: > Notes(none of these are blockers): > * Fuzzing page doesn't r

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4cxx 1.3.0

2024-10-16 Thread Robert Middleton
Notes(none of these are blockers): * Fuzzing page doesn't render correctly(https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4cxx/1.3.0/fuzzing.html) * The review kit link leads to a 404?? * SHA256 sums are not needed, but it doesn't hurt to add. I checked only the SHA512 sums. * The new release is missing a f

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4cxx 1.3.0

2024-10-15 Thread Piotr P. Karwasz
Hi Stephen, On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 at 06:33, Stephen Webb wrote: > Please download, test, and cast your votes on this mailing list. > > [ ] +1, release the artifacts > [ ] -1, don't release, because ... +1, release the artifacts I ran the build on my Debian system: piotr@migi:~$ uname -a Linux mi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4cxx 1.3.0

2024-10-14 Thread Piotr P. Karwasz
Hi Stephen, On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 at 06:33, Stephen Webb wrote: > Review kit: > https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/admin/release-review-instructions.md There is a small typo, the correct URL is: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/blob/master/admin/release-review-instructions.md For

[VOTE] Release Apache Log4cxx 1.3.0

2024-10-14 Thread Stephen Webb
This is a vote to release the Apache Log4cxx 1.3.0. Website: https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4cxx/1.3.0/changelog.html GitHub: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx Commit: 1370eee2c19bdc287b7aa98892af02fd136694e7 Distribution: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4cxx/ Signi