Hi,
These are my votes:
On 2.04.2025 19:12, Piotr P. Karwasz wrote:
Vote 1. Require a pull request before merging:
[ ] +1, enable this feature
[ ] -1, do not enable this feature
+1
Vote 2. Require conversation resolution before merging:
[ ] +1, enable this feature
[ ] -1, do not enable this
Hi all,
Sorry, my e-mail client reformatted some lines.
So, the concerned repos are all non-dormant Java repos: l-admin, l-jdk,
l-jmx-gui, l-log4j2, l-log4j-jakarta, l-log4j-kotlin, l-log4j-samples,
l-log4j-scala, l-log4j-transform, l-log4j-tools, l-parent.
Vote 1. Require a pull request befor
I am finding this email confusing. I think it is due to the formatting but I am
not sure. I am making my best guess.
Vote 1: Enable certain branch protection features on the code branches (`2.x`
and `main`) of all non-dormant Java repos:
I can’t vote on this as I don’t know what the impact of t
Hi,
Vote 1. Require a pull request before merging:
+1
Vote 2. Require conversation resolution before merging:
+1
Vote 3. Require linear history (Prevent merge commits from being pushed
to code branches. Only "Squash" and similar allowed):
-0.9
I really like a linear history, but I see some prob
On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 7:12 PM Piotr P. Karwasz
wrote:
> Hi all,
> Sorry, my e-mail client reformatted some lines.
> So, the concerned repos are all non-dormant Java repos: l-admin, l-jdk,
> l-jmx-gui, l-log4j2, l-log4j-jakarta, l-log4j-kotlin, l-log4j-samples,
> l-log4j-scala, l-log4j-transform,
On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 4:07 AM Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 7:12 PM Piotr P. Karwasz
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > Sorry, my e-mail client reformatted some lines.
> > So, the concerned repos are all non-dormant Java repos: l-admin, l-jdk,
> > l-jmx-gui, l-log4j2, l-log4j-jakarta,
OK. With the new descriptions I can vote on this.
> On Apr 2, 2025, at 10:12 AM, Piotr P. Karwasz
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> Sorry, my e-mail client reformatted some lines.
> So, the concerned repos are all non-dormant Java repos: l-admin, l-jdk,
> l-jmx-gui, l-log4j2, l-log4j-jakarta, l-log4j-kot
Hi all,
Trying to implement the RTC rules we discussed in September[1] I
encountered some problems due to the limitations of the currently
available GitHub Settings. This is a vote to decide whether or not
enable certain branch protection features on the code branches (`2.x`
and `main`) of th
Hi Ralph,
On 2.04.2025 17:40, Ralph Goers wrote:
I am finding this email confusing. I think it is due to the > formatting but I
am not sure. I am making my best guess.
Sorry, the e-mail client ate some new line characters.
Vote 1: Enable certain branch protection features on the code > branc
