Re: [Log4j] release 2.9 - Scala API

2017-07-07 Thread Matt Sicker
I won't be able to help out with that until next week at the earliest. I'm preparing a presentation this weekend (coincidentally one about Scala actually), but things are starting to simmer down finally. On 7 July 2017 at 13:39, Mikael Ståldal wrote: > It would be good if you could finalize the

Re: [Log4j] release 2.9 - Scala API

2017-07-07 Thread Mikael Ståldal
It would be good if you could finalize the release of logging-log4j-scala. I am ready to help. On 2017-07-07 01:04, Matt Sicker wrote: The code as is should be ready for source and binary artifacts I believe. I don't recall if there was a distribution zip task already set up, though, and I beli

Re: [Log4j] release 2.9 - Scala API

2017-07-06 Thread Matt Sicker
The code as is should be ready for source and binary artifacts I believe. I don't recall if there was a distribution zip task already set up, though, and I believe that's the minimal required artifacts for an Apache release. On 6 July 2017 at 17:19, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2

Re: [Log4j] release 2.9 - Scala API

2017-07-06 Thread Gary Gregory
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > I attempted a release, and we fixed something, but I was still unsure as to > how to build the website as the site:stage goal fails with missing file > errors if I recall correctly. Since then, I've been busy with a short term > work project ea

Re: [Log4j] release 2.9 - Scala API

2017-07-06 Thread Matt Sicker
I attempted a release, and we fixed something, but I was still unsure as to how to build the website as the site:stage goal fails with missing file errors if I recall correctly. Since then, I've been busy with a short term work project eating up all my energy, so I haven't had a chance to make anot

Re: [Log4j] release 2.9 - Scala API

2017-07-06 Thread Ralph Goers
Don’t we still need to get Scala integrated into the web site? Can we do that before the 2.9 release? Or has a Scala release not been done yet? Ralph > On Jul 6, 2017, at 1:15 PM, Mikael Ståldal wrote: > > Yes, I think that the 11.0 release of the Scala API should only be what we > currently

Re: [Log4j] release 2.9 - Scala API

2017-07-06 Thread Mikael Ståldal
Yes, I think that the 11.0 release of the Scala API should only be what we currently have in 2.8.2 plus Scala 2.12 support plus the already implemented ThreadContext wrapper in LOG4J2-1690. Basically just release what we currently have in the logging-log4j-scala Git repo. On 2017-07-05 23:2