Re: [Log4j] Public beta release

2017-08-31 Thread Ralph Goers
Yup. Besides, what is the difference between creating a release named 2.9.0-beta1 and 2.9.0 at this point. The release process is exactly the same. In addition, even if you do that I guarantee you will still find minor issues right after the non-beta release. Betas make sense when you are relea

Re: [Log4j] Public beta release

2017-08-31 Thread Gary Gregory
That might help but some folks will only use releases... Gary On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Mikael Ståldal wrote: > Yet again some users find bugs right after release of a minor version, so > far LOG4J2-2023 and LOG4J2-2026. > > Maybe we should do a public beta before next minor release (2.1

[Log4j] Public beta release

2017-08-31 Thread Mikael Ståldal
Yet again some users find bugs right after release of a minor version, so far LOG4J2-2023 and LOG4J2-2026. Maybe we should do a public beta before next minor release (2.10) to encourage testing by users who are not committers or PMC?