It is fine as long as it is documented that it can and why.
Ralph
> On Jul 16, 2017, at 11:22 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 11:20 PM, Ralph Goers
> wrote:
>
>> If there is no split then events could be lost during a reconfigure.
>>
>
> Yes, I know. I am wondering if we
I should add that it isn’t very likely though.
Ralph
> On Jul 16, 2017, at 11:20 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> If there is no split then events could be lost during a reconfigure.
>
> Ralph
>
>> On Jul 16, 2017, at 11:18 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>> Hi All:
>>
>> I have a Lucene5 branch base
On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 11:20 PM, Ralph Goers
wrote:
> If there is no split then events could be lost during a reconfigure.
>
Yes, I know. I am wondering if we should allow for this issue in this new
module and let users provide patches.
Gary
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Jul 16, 2017, at 11:18 PM, Gary
If there is no split then events could be lost during a reconfigure.
Ralph
> On Jul 16, 2017, at 11:18 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Hi All:
>
> I have a Lucene5 branch based on a patch from a user which said user has in
> production.
>
> The only obvious failing I see is that there is no split
Hi All:
I have a Lucene5 branch based on a patch from a user which said user has in
production.
The only obvious failing I see is that there is no split between appender
and manager.
The manager split could be done later. I am wondering if anyone has time to
code review the branch.
Thank you,
G
