A minimal log4j-android-core type of thing could be handy, though I feel
that would be easier to do with the log4j-core modularization I proposed a
while back. We wouldn't want to duplicate plugin code and things like that.
On 5 July 2017 at 15:57, Mikael Ståldal wrote:
> It would also be good i
It would also be good if log4j-jul works on Android.
And log4j-jcl (given that commons-logging itself works).
And log4j-slf4j-impl and log4j-to-slf4j (given that SLF4J itself works).
On 2017-07-05 22:19, Mikael Ståldal wrote:
I think it is enough with log4j-api support for Android in the 2.9
I think it is enough with log4j-api support for Android in the 2.9
release, we can fix log4j-core (or provide an alternative) later.
On 2017-07-05 22:05, Mikael Ståldal wrote:
First of all, we need to make sure that at least log4j-api works
flawlessy on Android. I think this is already covered
First of all, we need to make sure that at least log4j-api works
flawlessy on Android. I think this is already covered by
LOG4J2-1926.
But do we also aim for having log4j-core working on Android? It seems to
me that it could be a lot of work (and possibly force us to remove some
Android-incomp
