Alright, I'm closing this vote and starting a new release candidate.
On Sat, 3 Nov 2018 at 10:10, Matt Sicker wrote:
> Time slipped away yesterday. Doing this today. After this release, I’ll
> request infra move this repo to GitBox as well so we can start using GitHub
> directly.
>
> On Fri, Nov
Time slipped away yesterday. Doing this today. After this release, I’ll
request infra move this repo to GitBox as well so we can start using GitHub
directly.
On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 08:54, Matt Sicker wrote:
> Thanks for taking a look! I’ll review this today and hopefully can kick
> off a new vot
Thanks for taking a look! I’ll review this today and hopefully can kick off
a new vote.
On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 01:05, Raman Gupta wrote:
> Looks like the build has an issue running `mvn package` due to a
> Surefire plugin problem with JDK10, due to
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIR
Looks like the build has an issue running `mvn package` due to a
Surefire plugin problem with JDK10, due to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1439. However, even
after updating surefire, the build with JDK10 seems to fail due to
what seems like an incompatibility with the current Kotli
Did that build the source and javadoc jars as well?
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 20:59, Raman Gupta wrote:
> Matt, I had no issue building the site with jdk10:
>
> [INFO] Reactor Summary:
> [INFO]
> [INFO] Apache Log4j Kotlin API Parent 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT .. SUCCESS [
> 14.725 s]
> [INFO] Apache Log4j
Matt, I had no issue building the site with jdk10:
[INFO] Reactor Summary:
[INFO]
[INFO] Apache Log4j Kotlin API Parent 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT .. SUCCESS [ 14.725 s]
[INFO] Apache Log4j Kotlin API SUCCESS [ 9.741 s]
[INFO] Apache Log4j Kotlin API Samples 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT ..
It’s not the uploading I need help with. The pom config is broken
somewhere. You can test it locally by changing the deployment target to a
local instance of Nexus or Artifactory or probably even just stage it in
your local file system. In fact, running ‘mvn site’ should be enough to see
where the
Since I don't have permissions to upload I'm not sure I can help...
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 1:44 PM Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> It seems like the maven config is broken right now preventing me from
> performing the release. It doesn't upload the sources or jars which are
> required to publish on Maven
It seems like the maven config is broken right now preventing me from
performing the release. It doesn't upload the sources or jars which are
required to publish on Maven Central as far as I remember. That also breaks
the site generation.
If you can take a look into fixing that, I can put out a se
Following up on this. Any progress towards publication of this artifact?
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 3:57 PM Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> Oh, I guess that is what you published with mvn deploy.
>
> I would guess you need to release it again. Without knowing what the javadoc
> errors are I’m not sure what t
Oh, I guess that is what you published with mvn deploy.
I would guess you need to release it again. Without knowing what the javadoc
errors are I’m not sure what to tell you.
Ralph
> On Oct 12, 2018, at 12:55 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> I am seeing a staging repo that it looks like you just cr
I am seeing a staging repo that it looks like you just created.
Ralph
> On Oct 12, 2018, at 12:06 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> The staging repository in Nexus disappeared. I tried recreating it by
> running mvn deploy from the tag, but that only deployed the binaries to a
> staging repository. Ru
The staging repository in Nexus disappeared. I tried recreating it by
running mvn deploy from the tag, but that only deployed the binaries to a
staging repository. Running with -Papache-release has errors with the
maven-javadoc-plugin. Any ideas of what can be done here? Do I need to make
a new rel
Oh sorry, I totally forgot about this.
On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 at 18:52, Ralph Goers
wrote:
> Despite that, did you finish this?
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Oct 10, 2018, at 4:49 PM, Ralph Goers
> wrote:
> >
> > BTW - Remko voted +1 but this is a discussion thread, not the vote
> thread. At least for me the
Despite that, did you finish this?
Ralph
> On Oct 10, 2018, at 4:49 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> BTW - Remko voted +1 but this is a discussion thread, not the vote thread. At
> least for me they show up as separate threads.
>
> Ralph
>
>> On Sep 24, 2018, at 6:28 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
>>
>>
BTW - Remko voted +1 but this is a discussion thread, not the vote thread. At
least for me they show up as separate threads.
Ralph
> On Sep 24, 2018, at 6:28 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> Scratch that. I’ll finish this tomorrow. Haven’t been feeling well since
> fhe afternoon.
>
> On Mon, Sep 24
Scratch that. I’ll finish this tomorrow. Haven’t been feeling well since
fhe afternoon.
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 13:40, Matt Sicker wrote:
> +1 from me.
>
> I'll finish up the release tonight. Thanks for reviewing, and sorry for
> not getting back to this sooner!
>
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 at 12:40,
+1 from me.
I'll finish up the release tonight. Thanks for reviewing, and sorry for not
getting back to this sooner!
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 at 12:40, Remko Popma wrote:
> +1
>
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 2:03 AM Ralph Goers
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks - I finally got a chance to look at the release but i
+1
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 2:03 AM Ralph Goers
wrote:
> Thanks - I finally got a chance to look at the release but it still needs
> one more +1 from a PMC member.
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Sep 14, 2018, at 6:54 AM, Raman Gupta wrote:
> >
> > Its been 3 months since the last email on this, so I figured
Thanks - I finally got a chance to look at the release but it still needs one
more +1 from a PMC member.
Ralph
> On Sep 14, 2018, at 6:54 AM, Raman Gupta wrote:
>
> Its been 3 months since the last email on this, so I figured I'd give
> it a bump. Thanks!
>
> Regards,
> Raman
>
> On Mon, Aug
Its been 3 months since the last email on this, so I figured I'd give
it a bump. Thanks!
Regards,
Raman
On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 4:31 PM Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> Looks like I added the shasum files already. Please feel free to review
> this release. As it's the first version, I'm guessing I might ne
Looks like I added the shasum files already. Please feel free to review
this release. As it's the first version, I'm guessing I might need another
RC, but that depends on review.
On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 at 12:23, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Well, let me know if you are going to before I start looking at it.
Well, let me know if you are going to before I start looking at it.
Ralph
> On Aug 6, 2018, at 9:14 AM, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> Right. I may need to make a new release candidate, though, as the hashes
> were missing at first.
>
> On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 at 10:46, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
>> This vote
Right. I may need to make a new release candidate, though, as the hashes
were missing at first.
On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 at 10:46, Ralph Goers wrote:
> This vote never concluded. I still haven’t had a chance to review it but I
> have not forgotten.
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Jul 14, 2018, at 12:44 PM, Ralph G
This vote never concluded. I still haven’t had a chance to review it but I have
not forgotten.
Ralph
> On Jul 14, 2018, at 12:44 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> I’ll try to do this today or tomorrow.
>
> Ralph
>
>> On Jul 14, 2018, at 10:07 AM, Matt Sicker wrote:
>>
>> Apologies for the delay.
Sorry - I meant to get to this but got busy. I will try to look at this today.
Ralph
> On Jul 9, 2018, at 9:17 AM, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> I’ll try to put together a sample project to demo how to use this. I’m not
> sure how many of you use or are familiar with Kotlin. It would also be
> great t
26 matches
Mail list logo
