Re: [Discuss][VOTE] Release Apache Log4j Tools 0.4.0

2023-07-04 Thread Volkan Yazıcı
Indeed I should have had an RC2 in the email subject, my mistake. All the rest of the information is correct. Due to the difference in the shared commit IDs, it is clear that this VOTE email and the previous one don't point to the same release, even though RC2 is not explicitly mentioned. I propose

Re: [Discuss][VOTE] Release Apache Log4j Tools 0.4.0

2023-07-03 Thread Gary Gregory
IMO the email subject and text MUST contain the RC number. It's a small change that makes a huge difference. Gary On Mon, Jul 3, 2023, 18:33 Ralph Goers wrote: > I am confused. We had a vote thread for 0.4.0. Did you close that vote? > Maybe I just didn’t get that email again. > > The commit t

[Discuss][VOTE] Release Apache Log4j Tools 0.4.0

2023-07-03 Thread Ralph Goers
I am confused. We had a vote thread for 0.4.0. Did you close that vote? Maybe I just didn’t get that email again. The commit tag for this vote is not the same as the previous commit tag. So is this really rc-2? I despise having multiple release vote threads for the same release number as it is