I think it would be great to hear what the expected changes are to be
made here. It still seems like a huge amount of work that nobody cared
about until we published a CVE for v2 which was only applicable to v2
(something I tend not to see in smaller projects who rarely if ever
bother filing CVEs w
Hi
On Thu, Jan 6, 2022, at 15:05, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
> On 06/01/2022 14:42, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> Which ones? The JMSAppender issue or the SockerServer issue? Both have been
>> there >2012. What is suddenly so critical it requires re-releasing EOL
>> software? Or did you mean the multith
On 06/01/2022 15:17, Ralph Goers wrote:
Our repos aren’t open to any ASF committer, only Logging Services committers.
We have very few committers who are also not PMC members. So
you would likely be the only person with commit rights who might be interested
in doing the work required to do
> On Jan 6, 2022, at 7:05 AM, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
>
>
>
> On 06/01/2022 14:42, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> Which ones? The JMSAppender issue or the SockerServer issue? Both have been
>> there >2012. What is suddenly so critical it requires re-releasing EOL
>> software? Or did you mean the
On 06/01/2022 14:42, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Which ones? The JMSAppender issue or the SockerServer issue? Both have been there
>2012. What is suddenly so critical it requires re-releasing EOL software? Or
did you mean the multithreading issues?
Certain things have changed during the mo
Ceki,
Thank you for posting this. Your input here is always welcome so far as I am
concerned. This is a much better place to hold discussions than Twitter.
See below.
> On Jan 6, 2022, at 3:00 AM, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
>
>
> Dear Ron,
>
> Thank you for this detailed and very well crafted messa
Hello Ceki
On Thu, Jan 6, 2022, at 11:00, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
> The fact that the decision was unanimous on such a delicate matter is
> quite surprising and very interesting in itself with respect to group
> dynamics.
You haven't been at the meeting. That's why you don't know anything about this
Dear Ron,
Thank you for this detailed and very well crafted message. I would like
to make the following observations.
The fact that the decision was unanimous on such a delicate matter is
quite surprising and very interesting in itself with respect to group
dynamics.
Coming back to the i
Dear Log4j community,
While working on the December 2021 Apache Log4j 2 releases the Apache
Logging Services PMC received requests to reevaluate the 2015
End-of-Life (EOL) decision for Apache Log4j 1, which has seen its
latest release in 2012.
We have considered these requests and discussed vario
