on related to
> that target.
>
> 2018-05-10 23:09 GMT+02:00 William Davis :
>
> > Not a bad conversation to have. I would direct you to read this PR from
> the
> > SE.Redis library where I argued against netstandard 2.0 inclusion at one
> > point.
> > https:/
ality as a separate nuget library. Yes, splitting
> up log4net into several smaller assemblies sounds like a plan to me.
>
> 2018-05-10 18:00 GMT+02:00 William Davis :
>
> > Perhaps, but looking at that implementation I see that it is locking in a
> > few places on appen
the bufferingforwardingappender.
>
> On Thu, 10 May 2018, 04:48 William Davis,
> wrote:
>
> > Agreed, this is what ill be submitting next.
> >
> > On Wed, May 9, 2018, 9:47 PM Remko Popma wrote:
> >
> > > Perhaps a reasonable approach would be to work like
t;>> from
> >>>>>>> the data structure, potentially transforms it, then renders it to
> >>>> the
> >>>>>>> configured layout format and writes it to the configured
> >>>> appender(s).
> >>>>>&g
gurable so if log4j users really want to they can have
> > lock-free
> > > > logging in return for dedicating a cpu core. You may not want or need
> > to
> > > go
> > > > that far.
> > > >
> > > > Remko
> > > >
> > &g
implementing the async/await paradigm it would have to be provided
> > as a logging event api and continuously invoked with async down to the
> > appender implementations in order for the application code to benefit
> from
> > true async behavior. Or am I wrong here?
> > >
)
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 7:00 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 2:15 PM William Davis
> wrote:
>
> > I've noticed that there are several Async implementations of standard
> > appenders out in the wild. Is there a reason none of these have made
> there
r the authors never attempted to donate it upstream in the
> first place.
>
> On 7 May 2018 at 12:22, William Davis wrote:
>
> > Ok then, so are the same Async Appenders available in Log4Net that are in
> > Log4j ?
> > Here are some one I'm using:
> > http
d get
so much more value out of the core product if these were rolled in. (And I
wouldnt have to struggle to get .net core support from ill maintained
repos.)
On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 10:04 AM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> Oh, no worries, you're on the correct list!
>
> On 7 May 2018 at 0
flavours of async logging, several of which
> > use non-blocking data structures.
> >
> > Can you link to the ones you think should be included?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Remko
> >
> > (Shameless plug) Every java main() method deserves
I've noticed that there are several Async implementations of standard
appenders out in the wild. Is there a reason none of these have made there
way into the core product? Is it just b/c no one has taken the time to do a
pull request, or is there some other reason?
I've had several projects where
11 matches
Mail list logo
