Re: maven-shaded-log4j-transformer

2021-10-19 Thread Eduard Gizatullin
9:26 AM Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > Makes sense Eduardo, go ahead with your proposal for the first draft. > > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 7:22 PM Eduard Gizatullin > wrote: > > > Hello Volkan, > > > > Thanks for your explanation, I really appreciate it and I think I can &

Re: maven-shaded-log4j-transformer

2021-10-18 Thread Eduard Gizatullin
m also in favor of using GitHub all the way down: GitHub Issues > for > > >>> issue tracking, GitHub Actions for CI/CD (yes, even CD!), GitHub > pages > > >> for > > >>> publishing the Maven-generated site, etc. > > >>> > > >

Re: maven-shaded-log4j-transformer

2021-10-15 Thread Eduard Gizatullin
r shading" > problem. > Hence, the PR needs to target the `release-2.x` branch. > > Also note that since this is a non-trivial contribution, you need to sign the > ICLA document <https://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.pdf> and email it to > the ASF . > Once you have done t